Laserfiche WebLink
�.- �� --- . i. <br />I <br />Meeting Date: <br />: , . . ., . . . _ . . ._.. ._ . I <br />_ _ E��-'-'- -- -- ' -' -=- - -. _ <br />REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />Staff Report by: <br />Planning Case No.: <br />Applicant: <br />February 18, 1998 <br />Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector <br />513-98 <br />Preferred Builders, Inc. <br />Request: The applicant is requesting ::�. 7 foot Variance to the required 30 <br />foot building setback from a. public right-of-way along Ardan <br />Avenue for the construction of a new single-family home at 8265 <br />Spring Lake Road. <br />Locatione <br />PIN No. <br />Zoning/Land Use: <br />8265 Spring Lake Road <br />06-30-23-23-0003 <br />R-1- Single Family Residential <br />LD - Low Density Residential <br />Attachments: Planning Application <br />Location Map <br />Hardship Statement <br />Encroachment Map <br />Building Plan <br />Lot Survey of Previous Home <br />Planning Commission Resolution # 532-98 <br />� <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Section 1104.01, Subd. 3., requires a 30 foot building setback when abutting a public <br />street. <br />Section 1125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria to be used by the Planning Commission in <br />its review of variances. The following criteria are individually addressed in Planning <br />Commission Resolution 532-98: <br />a. Exceptional or eYtraordinary circumstances apply to the properties which do not apply <br />generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or <br />shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since <br />the effective date hereof have had no control. <br />b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this <br />Title. <br />