My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�.s-� _ _ � : = � - - _�� - --� , <br />�:'�%....� __._�._ -� _ 1LL _ _•__ --' e. 1_" -- � � _�_._ �.y� . - . =����_� - - - � � � - -- � - ---- —� - �'— -'- -- -'-"- <br />X <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 4, 1998 <br />Page S <br />Mr. Cunningham to(d the owners of the adjoining properties that TOLD would be <br />willing to re-engineer the site so that all storm water run-off was stored on Walgreen <br />ro ert inc(udina that of the ad oinin ro erties. "' <br />P P Y, � J gP P � <br />� �'h <br />: <br />Joan Colleen, 2617 County Road I, said her concerns:.,were li�l�€,��;, ����ic, and the <br />easements that are involved. She asked who would 1���spo�zsz�I�: �c,�° t�z� �axes that <br />would be �aid on the 45 feet of property that the ��'t��ect repo� c��:c.t �`:f�;�.��c� ���; �iven to <br />adjoining neighbors. Would this be considered a��enic ease�t�nt or �t E�r;c�ir;f�P�� ease� <br />she asked. �;�'� %� <br />`, � <br />Associate E: icson stated the property would be � <br />developer would be paying taxes on that property <br />,;;;,;: <br />Ms. Keyes said she is not interested in the lau�< �f <br />Ms. Colleen said she is concerned that,,whate��,�; <br />development, will in fact, happen �yt�is agreet� tic <br />::::�� <br />'::::N' <br />Associate Ericson assured 1VIs: �olleen ��at once <br />a developers agreement, the ��r�emen� Vuill be the <br />through with the terms of t�e agreemen�,there y�r�j <br />rai . <br />that the project will b�cett�ipleted as=a�,��ci:'�;�� <br />�..l��kF�tr+r&�1� Yeie�°cCI��P �;(�tf� <br />tliese'���'�.r1s r�f la.nd ���tai��` <br />citizens i:r� �iE��'c�,.. <br />7. Sta��Itepmn���/��k��rx����i�u� <br />se <br />(�,e developer and the <br />to maintain it. <br />ed �n;tegards to the proposed <br />resolution is established, and there is <br />�. If the developer does not follow <br />a performance bond to make sure <br />audic;nce tl�e Comprehensive Plan review that includes <br />�dressed on February 11, 1998. He invited all interested <br />D'rrector Jopke to�cr ��yE�`Commission the first meeting of the Comprehensive Plan Update, <br />area No. 1, will be>at the cafeteria of the Pinewood School on February 11, 1998. <br />,;<�:�' <br />�h�irperson �nd Planning Commissioners Reports <br />���o�aer Miller told the Commissioners she would be absent from the Planning <br />ssion meeting to be held on the 18th of February due to medical reasons. <br />9. Adjournment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.