My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
___ _ <br />--- -- -- - -. : <br />�--- - <br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 <br />Speciat Meeting Page 7 <br />1. Prior to the City Council's review, show RCWD stormwater drainage requirements <br />if they exist. <br />2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall accomplish the <br />following: <br />a. Obtain access and grading permits from MnDOT and Ramsey County, if <br />required, and provide proof of such permit or permission to the City. <br />b. Obtain a RCWD permit <br />c. Remove the two incidental directional signs from the County Road H-2 <br />right of way. <br />d. Enter into a development agreement with the City. <br />Chairperson Peterson stated there was a miscalculation on the percentage of impervious <br />surface area. He suggested correcting this number before the plan is approved. <br />Darvvin Lindahl, Saturn Development's representative, told the Commission the issue of <br />conforming to the RCWD requirements is being resolved. He added the total amount of <br />impervious surface is the same or may be even less than the existing development. Taking <br />this into account, there might not be a need for on-site stormwater retention. <br />Chairperson Peterson opened the floor to the public for question regarding the Saturn <br />Development. <br />No questions or comments were considered from the public. <br />Motion/Second: BrasaemleBrooks, to recommend approval ofResolution 535-98, <br />recommending approval of the development review request made by Saturn Development <br />Company, with the stipulations as stated. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />7. <br />Planning Case No. 507-97 <br />2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eastwood Road <br />Applicant: TOLD Development, for Walgreen's <br />Discussion Regarding Walgreen's Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and <br />Rezoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.