My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� , : - --- � = r` � <br />._ _______ _ _ __ _ _ <br />�_ � v__ _ _ _ , _ _ , <br />Planning Corrunission Report <br />TOLD Development Rezoning & Comp Plan Amendment <br />March 18, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />the property via County Road I. Staffhas not had any discussions with MnDOT or Mr. Peters to <br />ascertain if there are any compromises that could be worked out with regard to the access point. <br />Traffic Calming on Greemvood Drive. Staff has enlisted the assistance of Mike Ulrich, Director <br />of Public Works, to assess the possibility of adding some type of traffic calming measures to <br />Greenwood Drive. This idea has been discussed at previous meetings as a possible means to both <br />reduce and slow down traffic passing through the neighborhood. Mr. IJlrich has indicated that of <br />the many possibilities, a mid-block diversion that would create a slight S-curve in the road might <br />be acceptable. Staff is seeking the input of the City Engineer on this possibility. <br />Analysis: <br />Staff has presented the Planning Commission with two items for consideration at this meeting if <br />the Commission so desires. Resolution 536-98 recommends approval of the comprehensive plan <br />amendment to the City Council while Ordinance No. 614 is the vehicle by which the properties <br />are rezoned to reflect the B-2, Limited Business classification. Approval of the Ordinance can be <br />done by a simple motion. <br />One of staf�s concerns with the rezoning is what would happen if, after the rezoning was <br />approved, the applicant for whatever reason did not follow through with his plans to develop the <br />site. The City would be left with four non-confornung single-family homes. This can be <br />prevented simply by not publishing the Ordinance in the official City newspaper until after all of <br />the other hurdles have been cleared, such as the major subdivision, vacation of Eastwood Road <br />and the major subdivision. If the ordinance does not get published, it does not become effective. <br />At this point, other than not knowing the results of the APA research results, staff is not aware of <br />any other concerns that have not yet been addressed with regard to the proposed rezoning and <br />comprehensive plan amendment. If the developer has worked out a settlement with the adjacent <br />properties, then the results of the APA research become less of a iactor in a decision on these <br />requests. Last, the date by which a final decision would need to be reached on these requests is <br />May 29, 1998. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approving Planning Commission Resolution 536-98, a resolution <br />recommending that the City Council approve a comprehensive plan amendment to change <br />the designations of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood <br />Road to NC, Neighborhood Commercial, allow for the construction of a Walgreens Drug <br />Store. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.