My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ _. . _.�:;i L � C�'���------ ----� i�.. � : w=__.. _ �l f�-- :z- __ ,. �:- -- <br />- . _ � . . ..:, :_ , � , _ _ „ <br />� .._ _ <br />I <br />Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 <br />March 18, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />WHEREAS, the SRF study indicated that development potential of the property located <br />at 2625 Highway 10 would be enhanced if combined with adjacent properties; and; <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that the proposed <br />amendment is consistent with the general land use goals and policies containerl in the <br />Comprehensive Plan as follows: <br />Goal 1. Develop a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships <br />among activities and uses. <br />The change from high density and low density residential to neighborhood commercial will <br />allow for the commercial development of the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and <br />County Road I intersection, an intersection that already supports three corners of higher <br />intensity commercial uses--a Hardees Restaurant and the Moundsview Square Shopping <br />Center, a SuperAmerica gas station and convenience store, and a Burger King Restaurant. <br />Given the high traffic counts at this intersection, it would seem more appropriate to use <br />the land fox commercial rather than residential development. The proposed amendment is <br />in keeping with the community goal of limiting commercial development to the Highway <br />10 corridor. The neighborhood commercial designation is the least common designation <br />used in the comprehensive plan, representing less than one-quarter of one percent of the <br />properties in the City. The proposed use would be set back approximately 130 feet from <br />neighboring residential properties and separated by a minimum 70 feet of greenspace and <br />other physical buffering. The neighborhood commercial designation, as opposed to the <br />more intensive highway commercial designation, would in itself be a buffer to the <br />adjoining residendal properties. <br />Goa12. Maintain and, where necessary, upgrade land uses and environmental quality. <br />The policy under this goal directs attention to protecting integrated use districts (residential <br />neighborhoo+ds, commercial centers, industrial parks) from penetration by through traffic. <br />By virtue of its pro�cimity to Highway 10 and County Road I, the residential district <br />already experiences a penetration of through traffic. Redeveloping the subject properties <br />for a commercial use will add to the existing traffic in this residential district. The <br />tradeoff, however, is that Eastwood Road would no longer feed into the Highway 10 / <br />County Road I intersection thus eliminating a notable point of conflict and with the <br />addition of a right turn lane onto Highway 10 from eastbound County Road I, the overall <br />functioning of the intersection will be significantly improved. <br />Goal 3. Preserve and protect property values. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.