My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.. _-- _ - < � - �- - --= -- _ <br />- - .. . _ _ . - . . - --- ---- � - - � �.,_ _ :_._.�. .. _ . .� .. .. �i r. . - - � .I <br />E <br />Mounds View Planning Commission January 7, 1998 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />want to be left out of any of the theater and ring road development processes. She asked <br />the Planning Commission for their reassurance that notices would be sent for all meetings <br />pertaining to this issue. <br />Chairperson Peterson toid Ms. Olsen that no more formal actio� �ias <br />theater development concept plan since early 1997. FIe add�d. �� � ?,� <br />:>:::::, > <br />involvement of the Mn/DOT had come later in the y.,�::;;; <br />Director Jopke agreed with Commissioner Peter��i�n and ad�� tha�. .';� <br />involvement with the signaling of Highway 10 far;;�:iis pro�j�i����is not tic <br />concept. The signal issue is a stand-alone iierri. �:;:;::::::;::::>;;�;:;<;:;;:; ' <br />Ms. Olsen stated that it is the Association's und <br />the tra�c lighting as proposed that the ring roa�E <br />Commissioner Miller asked Ms. Ol <br />if it is developed. <br />j�i.:nion, <br />'taken on the <br />road idea and <br />road <br />the developer could get <br />�ded. <br />e using the ring road <br />Ms. Olsen told the Commission t�at the ri��'road �hr������ �i =�� � e�se the traffic on Mounds <br />View Drive. She referred to �;,��riments t<t�t had bee� made by the developer; saying that <br />he, too, thought that most ��;��� traffi��;t?vould be �t�tning from the south and southwest <br />and not from the north. __ ....... <br />Se�.�; � ���'the Cai���x;� <br />, :;:: <br />a,���*� } , ! . a nd up �. �3�� <br />r <br />C�t���r�i���,�i��ff�T,� < <<�-..�;; �� �,��, <br />COI111I]z� I� �a'�� .>' i� �;.�r<.: Ot' <br />wQ�.,i�` noi, l�, c�; <br />disa� ` <br />�oad. <br />that the logical traf�ic flow would be <br />�st of the people coming in to use the theater will be <br />iew, and the side streets, such as Mounds View Drive, <br />Commissio�x 5��;�t�k� ����� referred to a traffic study that was done for the theater <br />development. T��� study showed that traffic would not increase much on Mounds View <br />Drive. He also;<s�g;ested that if the speed limit on Mounds View drive was kept very low <br />people would<:�ot want to use the road. <br />>i;�� �fopke stated that SR.F, the City Engineering firm, was asked to look at the <br />,�;:�a.�;r development traffic study a second time taking into account the possibility oithe <br />��ng road connection. This study showed a 200-400 car increase on Mounds View Drive <br />if the ring road is developed. <br />Commissioner Brasaemle added that this recent study was made not showing a curb cut <br />on H-2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.