My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�.. _. , -_s. � . _ . _ . ` : . - �--_-- �— - .- .. . _-..4��_ �� -- - �� �i. __Y�/� r.._.�.�/_ _...--- � G_�.r <br />'.`_----"_.—_ - __ _ . . . ,.: ., <br />� � -- ---.. _ , _. _ � - .1..�:_Y -�� -h,. . , <br />Maunds View Planning Commission January 7, 1998 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />makes no sense. <br />Commissioner Brooks answered no to the first question. She voiced her opinion in favor <br />of the ring road concept. <br />Commissioner Stevenson said he wanted more studi� on the <br />access; whether or not it ended up on Long Lake Ro�::�s anoti <br />road is not a priority for the theater development. ::;<`::�'��� <br />Chairperson Peterson said that the connectior� � <br />added if there was to be a connection that the d��� <br />much because you end up with a long, long accPs <br />ring road concept plan is a possibility but more in <br />decision regarding this issue. He added his tend�� <br />not the best way to deal with the traffic problerr��; <br />iz� <br />;� 2i �Rt <br />n Hi�l� <br />es of a second <br />;��e said the ring <br />�e Road i� ��, :.� � c4;h�;r''He <br />Ived wouldn'�. i� ��,,,,��;�rily help <br />e craffic backups. He said the <br />�V;���eded to make a good <br />,�>�;:rt>F;;�s_that the ring road is <br />Comn�issioner Nliller told the Com����loner� ���'�; � �eels t�at an access to Long Lake <br />is not necessary to make the theat��''project �x�jr��;; �� �� rG17at because of the wetland <br />mitigation issues she is not in fa�u�i�'�of the r.��i� roa�� <br />Commissioner Obert saic�;;�:�;tt�ng as;t��'�develop�<�has agreed to proceed without a <br />tr�c light at Highway l f� �� is the d��loper's ,t�€��iness. He said he feels Highway 10 <br />divid�s the City ancl f'' � i �� ;�ng road ����������?�� �olve this problem he would be in favor of <br />it. .>:;>:: :<: :::: . _. <br />�'}i���°,��r ,'; ��� T��i:^ �:: � 4c� >��� ��ommissioners that after hearing the comments made in <br />the str����; f���li i�€�C tk�cr�=; � s�,r��€��sus that there is not a need for an access on to Long <br />Lake 1Z�c��; � t��'i��aae ai �he ���� road was not fimily opposed. It was agreed by all that <br />so�i��}i'ing ne�t�� i � L�� �one about Highway 10's traffic problems and this ring road <br />��iicept may or ��ia� ��� �i� the answer. <br />����f4if;i;�;:� Case No,:��:�<�-97 <br />��, .} I > � , �� 7 � �1 ��g1lT��'� 1 � <br />r ,; � ' � �;fr�����''s Greenhouses, Inc. <br />C���,_:�:,,;�i_�__s �tse permit for flower mart. <br />The applicant, representing Linder's Greenhouses, Inc., was not present. <br />Chairperson Peterson asked the staff if there was anything different on this year's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.