My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � k� r _. -=�i �f. _- _- <br />. _. :_���- ----- -- � � - - -_- ,.� _ _ �'- � <br />memo to the <br />' Plannin Commission <br />TO: Planning Commissioners <br />FROM: Jim Ericson <br />SUBJECT: Commission Packet 4/15/98 <br />DATE: April 11, 1998 <br />As you can see from the agenda, there are many things before the Commission at this meeting. <br />Because of the Good Friday holiday and the number of Planning cases, this packet was delayed in <br />getting to you, for which I apologize. <br />I'd like to point out that I have provided resolutions for all of the items, with the exception of the <br />Theater, which is not included with this packet. This will be delivered to you in some form before <br />your meeting Wednesday. The three conditional use permits are non-controversial as is the minor <br />subdivision, thus action should be possible. With the CUPs, public hearing dates will have already <br />been set for the 4/27/98 Council meeting, so if there is any information that you need in order to <br />take action. Please let me know and I will arrange to get it for you. The simple minor subdivision <br />is also non-controversial, so I would expect that action could be taken on this as well. I had not <br />originally planned to provide you with resolutions for each planning case, but I would like to clear <br />the schedule so as to not get too backlogged as we approach the busier months. <br />The other two cases, the Bridges review and the Walgreens resolutions of denial, should not pose <br />any difficulties as you've seen them before (in the case of Walgreens, six tim�s! The public <br />hearing for Walgreens will take place at the Council on Apri127, 1998. Bob Cunningham hopes <br />to have gained the support of all neighboring property owners by that time. The cash settlement <br />amount has been increased and he tells me that three property owners have signed on. Regarding <br />the MnDOT access, the site will work without it if MnDOT holds firm--I told Mr. Cunningham <br />that the City would not act in defiance of MnDOT. <br />Included with your packet is the Council agenda for April 13, 1998. <br />Again, if there is any information (other than Theater info) that you will need in order to take <br />action on some items, let me know, Expect to see the theater report soon. <br />Thank you. <br />... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.