Laserfiche WebLink
;� <br />i <br />� <br />..___= - I __ _:� �_. _'- _- , p <br />Planning Case No. 520-98 <br />Oversized Shed Conditional Use Permit <br />Ronald Overton -- 2824 Woodale Drive <br />April 15, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />Analysis: <br />Dimensional Reguirements • <br />Shed Setbacks (Front) <br />(Side) <br />(Rear) <br />Percent of Rear Yard <br />Area of all Accessory Buildings <br />CUP requirements• <br />R ir <br />30 feet <br />5 feet <br />5 feet <br />< 25% <br />5 1,264 sf. <br />Proposed <br />175 feet <br />8 feet <br />73 feet <br />1.3% <br />308 sf. <br />, - ��`: <br />� _ f � � -� �� � <br />i_ __ � -= _ .._� . � <br />Met? <br />Met <br />Met <br />Met <br />Met <br />Met <br />Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code states that no accessory building other than a garage shall <br />exceed 216 square feet except by conditional use pernvt. With a CUP, the maximum area for all <br />accessory buildings is 1,264 square feet. Section 1125.01 gives a list of criteria that must be <br />satisfied in order for conditional use permits to be approved. These criteria are as follows: <br />Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas <br />so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential <br />property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 2824 Woodale <br />Drive, low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br />4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br />The majority of the lots in this area are larger than what is typical for Mounds View. The subject <br />property along with those unmediately adjacent to it are '/4 of an acre or larger, some of which are <br />heavily wooded. While the proposed shed is larger than what is might be standard for this area, the <br />placement of the building 100 feet behind home hides it street view, The shed would be visible only to <br />the two neighboring properties. The home be:und the subject property is screened by the rolling <br />typography and extensive tree cover. <br />Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br />The conversion and relocation of the existing garage will serve to increase the subject property's <br />value without negatively impacting the values of the neigY►boring properties. However, because the <br />garage's stucco e:cterior matches the exterior of the home, staff would stipulate that the shed <br />maintain a consistent and uniform appearance �vith the house until such time that the shed is removed <br />from the property. <br />