My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEMO <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: James Ericson, Planning Associate <br />Subject: Mermaid Parking Lot Problems <br />Date: Meeting of August 19, 1998 <br />Last week, it came to staff's attention that the plans approved for the Mermaids bowling <br />expansion had some errors. There appears to be a seven -foot descrepancy between what the <br />plans show and what is actually out there with regard to building location and the north property <br />line. The result of this is that there is not enough room for the parking lot as it was shown on th <br />plans to be built. One full row of parking will fit with a drive aisle, but not two. <br />Before the expansion, there were 515 parking spaces on the property. After the expansion, a total <br />of 505 spaces would be available, assuming that all of the spaces could be built. Because of the <br />measurement error, only 25 of the 38 spaces north of the building can be built, using the north <br />property line for parallel parking and 90 degree parking adjacent to the building. While this is a <br />net reduction of another 13 spaces, the final total of parking provided would still be more than <br />what is required. (Attached is the second page from the Council staff report which shows the <br />parking requirements for the site.) <br />The applicant is proposing to expand the parking north of the building so that a full two rows with <br />a drive aisle between them can be constructed, which requires a minimum 60 feet, curb to curb, <br />not considering any setbacks. What is available, from sidewalk to property line, is 55 feet at the <br />building's northeast corner, increasing to 64 feet at the northwest corner. The applicant, on the <br />attached lot survey and parking proposal, is to encroach five feet beyond the property line into the <br />Perkins property. I addition, the applicant proposes to open up a secondary access to the Perkins <br />site, promoting a safer traffic circulation between the two properties and also to encourage a <br />shared parking arrangement between the two uses. <br />A formal application has not yet been made; the purpose of this meeting is to discuss the options <br />and give direction to staff as well as the applicant as to how to proceed. Staff will present it's <br />prefered course of action at the meeting. <br />James Ericson, Planning Associate <br />C:\OFFICEIW PW rNNW PDOCSVERICSOMMERMAID. MEM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.