Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />August 19, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />An 80- foot -long driveway would be part of the improvement and would be constructed of <br />concrete. As a condition of granting the CUP, it was stated that the driveway improvement take <br />place within a three -month -time period. An additional requirement imposed by ap ing this <br />CUP would be to further screen the proposed garage by means of erecti+ pri : fence parallel <br />to Pinewood Drive between the garage and the property line .' the we <br />Staffs concern was that the garage (1,008 sq. ft.) was ou <br />(682 sq. ft.). The width of the garage from the street vi <br />to that of the house. "The bulk of the garage will not b <br />a community perspective to have property owners impr <br />properties are then usually kept in better order," Ericson <br />roportio <br />howeve <br />n fro " e street. 1 <br />roperties with ga <br />of the ho <br />It was staffs recommendation to have the Planning Co <br />resolution recommending to the City Council appro <br />application, requested by Tammy Bellamy, 218 <br />S1 et- <br />Mgegki sq."- <br />nce the <br />ar <br />om <br />to prepare a <br />tional Use Permit <br />Chairperson Peterson returned the floor t•e Co �{ s� '$+ns and comments of the <br />applicant. <br />Tammy Bellamy, 2185 Pinewoo <br />application expire because she h <br />she was not . ble to take the <br />appiicatio neighb <br />Bellam .A.: The <br />work being <br />Stevenson <br />owner dec. <br />tol. ' xe Co ' `p on she had let her 1997 CUP <br />ecome tir of fig with her neighbor over the matter, and <br />ed time ® ` '> • attend meetings in regards to the <br />put up a 0 : ence to screen their property from the <br />e also gu. anteed to their neighbors that there will be no <br />on their own, stored in the garage. <br />open a <br />neig <br />ex <br />ds to what would happen to the property if its current <br />garage, if allowed, would be attractive for somebody wanting to <br />the garage. This use would not be a permitted use for the <br />an <br />could get the garage approved, she would be staying in Mounds View <br />ad future remodeling plans for the house, too. <br />e would like to include as part of the Resolution that privacy fencing be <br />:a. equately screen the building. <br />Obert stated if the property was in such a condition that a privacy fence was required to hide it <br />from view that he would be opposed to this type development. He stated his concern that the <br />City would be setting a dangerous precedent for the development of other oversized and out of <br />proportion garages in the community. <br />