Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds �/ievv Planning Gommis�ion <br />R�guiar Meeting <br />x . -.., <br />-..:- � <br />w�uld be i�stafled? ihe applicant expiained <br />�hat to pui a security syst�m in ravo�ald be the <br />decision of the owner �r�d also informed iher� <br />ihat the church i� self i�sured. <br />�arb CEoues, 2875 Co�nty Road H, was <br />concerned about her safe#y. T}�e appli�ant <br />indica4ed #hat the�rate of fc�ss 40 � retail mall is <br />les� than thafi o# residenfial property. <br />Sfeve �orden, 3009 Counfiy Road H, ask�d if <br />fhe lighfing on the sit� v�o�ld be on. ihe <br />applicani explained ihai no direci illuminatian is <br />allowed onto adjacer�t prtaperties. <br />Lyle �ellis, 2g7i Courtty Road H, asked whai <br />the addresses of the congr�gation members <br />were and how many w�r� s�uth of Highway 36. <br />ihe applicani informed Mr. Bellis that 5 percent <br />of the congregati�n iived soufh of Highway 36 <br />and approximately 20 percent live in �ll�unds <br />Vi ew. <br />Chair Peterson asked the appiicant to address <br />the drainage issues. Mr. Diem began by <br />expl�ining that better ihan 15Q feet is going <br />towards the wesi and exiting at a controll�d <br />rate to Pleasanfi View Drive and the remainder <br />to County Road H. 7he Planning Commission <br />noted 4hat the Engineer expressed concern <br />with filt�ation. Mr. Diem continued to expEain <br />the drainage for the siie. The applicani stated <br />tha# they are proposing io mave the building <br />farther to ihe west, some addition�l parking <br />would then be in back and more greer� spac� <br />would be cr°eated at �he exit. <br />Lyle 6ellis, 297°7 Go�anty Road H, inquired <br />about th� prcaposal to widen C��snty Road I�. <br />Ghair �e#erson informed �im ih�i Plan�ing <br />', <br />i` <br />