My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 12:29:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 11:56:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mo�nds Vievv Pl�nr�ing Cort�missiort October 2, 199f <br />Regular fVleefing Page 13 <br />ordinan� i�cludes non-residentiai u��s in an <br />R-1, R-2, R-3, R-� or R-5 District li�ted a� <br />conditional uses such as nursing ��mes, <br />churches, etc., except for go�ernmentai and <br />pubiic utility buildings �nd sfructures needed <br />for pub{ic healih, safety a�d vvelfare, �+hich <br />shall be a min�rr�urra of one acre and she noted <br />tha# this was not C2an Moon's reque�t, but was <br />her sugg�s4icsn and rer�inded the Pl�nning <br />Commission ihai they felt they sho�ld leave it <br />in. Th� lasi sec4�on thaf was discussed w�s <br />n�n-conforming cvntinuance of �ase vahich say� <br />thai ifi yvu have a p�ar�ing lai ih�t d�es nnt r�ow <br />meet fh� s�tba�k�, you can keep usir�g ii, <br />restripe or resurface,� �tc. (which does in�C�de <br />grindirrg it up a�d re[aying it) and keep it ihe <br />�ame si�e. <br />At #his time the Pi�nr�ing Commissinn thanked <br />' � Ms. Sheldon for taking the time to clarify some <br />o# the confusirtg sections of the Code �r�d <br />bringing fih�m to the Planning Commission for <br />discussion. <br />[�irecior Sheldon v�en# on to discuss #he it@m <br />regarding the liaison relationship to Ciiy <br />�ouncil and requested the Planning <br />Comrni�sion's feelings regarding thi� issue. It <br />was the consensus o� th� Planning <br />C�mrr�ission �hat a member of the City Gouncil <br />should be present at all Planning Co�nmission <br />meetings to report on the activiiy of #he <br />Gommission because they feel the Commission <br />goes into more depth and detail and th�fi the <br />Counci[ should be apprised af those detaifs and <br />"digging work" that is involved. ii�e <br />Commission alsa felt th�t if there are fiaisons, <br />there shouid b� fair treatment �f tk�e <br />Commissions. Commi�sioner Si�ven�orr r�oied <br />th�t he has beerr o� th� Parks a�d R�cre�fiio� <br />Gornmission f�r almost ten years and ��ou�ci! <br />. ' � �. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.