My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 12:29:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 11:56:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iviounds �iew Planrung Co�nmissior� <br />Regular ii�eeiin� <br />these spaces. <br />Rochelle Mooa�, 6929 Pleasant Vjew Driv�, cornmented that <br />one af the criteria in a Conditaonal Use Pertnit is t�ai It-1 <br />is tow intensity. �Nhen a parkang lot is designed the way <br />ihat this one is proposed t� allova more spac�s to fi�, it indicates <br />that they are trying to sque�ze toa much on tocs small of � lot. <br />There£ore, one has to de��rmiiie whether or nat this is � <br />appropriate use for the property. <br />Sieve Bord�n, 3009 Coranty I�oad F�., siated oae of ihe cri$eri� <br />is that the proposed structure will not have art adverse affect �pon <br />th� neighboring resfdential prop�r�ies. I3e beli�ves thai a parkin� <br />lot next to the neighborin� yards will h�ve an adverse affeci o� their <br />properties. He beiieves it vvilt ha,ve an adverse a.ffect ora potential <br />sale of his property in #he future. <br />IVIY°. Diem, in respons�, siated aII of the chan�es they have made <br />to the plans have not b�en to change the design or scope of ihe <br />projeci to fit the ordinane�. it has bee� to tryy to appease the <br />neighbors. It is to try to make ihe property as beau�iful as <br />possible. <br />Bariaara� Cloues, 2875 Couniy Rd. � asked if the chnarch members, <br />after learning how many changes were needed just ta comply <br />with requirem�nts, felt perhaps the si�e was not adequate. <br />Donald Kratt, 1437 76th l�venue N.E. Fridley, stated tiie majority <br />of the changes have cam� about due to their attemp�s to appease <br />the neighbors. <br />Rochelle Moon, 6929 Pleasant `liew I7rive, stated there is nothing <br />in i�ae proQosal that is af benefit to her. Without the variance, the buffer <br />would need to be reduc�d to five feei vahi�h the Planning <br />Commission agre�d i� not adequate. <br />Nfr. Diem noted ihai the ord°uiance all��rs for bufferis�g either by <br />f�ncin� ar by landscaping and they vvo�aid tmeet ih� five foot <br />requirement with a fence. <br />In regard to a disceassion about gr�ntir�g a variar►ce for a proposal <br />�epteiraber 4, 1996 <br />Pag� 10 <br />'j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.