My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 12:29:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 11:56:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- -� . -.: � . . . . ._. � , <br />. • <br />-� �. �� . * ..�. <br />:��_ <br />'..� � � �.. .� �. , , ,. <br />_ ,, � > ��.:�. � y. - •-� 1 � .. <br />•�� •i.• .•• 'i - ��^ <br />• •i�� ^•� �: � r...� • . � • •:�}� . .;` ....... �....., <br />' � � � �. # - : � �': a ' ' � �- <br />�!• ... ��: � i�l�--��• . .-.. . �� �� ,-. . .._ <br />' • � - ,� ." + .R � <br />Lynr� 1�lidseth, 3001 C�unty Road H, wanted tea <br />know if the Planning �omrriission recammends <br />denial and it goes ta �ity Council, w8�at v�+ill they <br />do wifh the information? �hair Peterson <br />r�pfied by saying thai one of the Planning <br />Commission's main jobs is �o make sure tY�ai all <br />issues are explored, Direcior Sheldon also <br />replied by sayir�g that ihe City Gouncil receives <br />a staff repor� along with the Pianning <br />Commission's recommendaiion and a public <br />i�earing vvill be heEd by fh� City Councii and <br />they will then t�take their decision. <br />Commission �rasaemfe �xplained thafi this <br />decision has noihing to do with the church, it� <br />membership or �is feelings toward ihe c,�urch. <br />He was recomrrier�di�g denial because of lot <br />size and the fact #hat the he believes it io be an <br />overdevelopment of the lot #hafi is d�signat�d <br />R-1, fow densify use and he concurs vvith <br />Staff s recomrnendation tha� ih� height and size <br />ofi ihe buiidir�g do not f# #�e surrounding area. <br />He also expr�ssed ihat he shares �he concern� <br />with the sur-rounding property owners regarding <br />th� parking lot and its effeci on property vai��s, <br />b�t stat�d thaf h� undersiands property values <br />ter�d nat to decrease wher� �here is a church <br />buiit ir� a neighborhood. Ne stated that the <br />parking lot adds �n ex�raordinary circumstance, <br />and that if this w�re a one �cre lot and th�r� <br />w�re more buffer, he would have �o problem <br />wi�h the request. <br />) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.