Laserfiche WebLink
Latirez Variance Request <br />Pla�ning Case No. 503-97 <br />September 17, i 997 <br />Page 3 <br />other words, approximately two car widths. The Code allows %r wider driveways as they <br />approach �he horr�e or garage up to 35 feet. This criterian cannot be meY. <br />7, This variancs will not imnair the su,��ly Q.f ii�ht or air to ad�ac�ni�r�ertiesb increa.s� <br />S���stiQn�n .puhlic stre�ts ne dang�r public safe�% or s�abstantiall� dt�t�ro� <br />val�aes ix� the nei,�hborh�d. Whiie granting of this varia�ce would not impair the supply of <br />air and li�ht to the adjacent property owners, fhe impact to property values or puhlic safety <br />may not be as clear. It wouid not be expected that traffic would in�rease as a result of the <br />wider-than-allowed driveway curb-cut. 'This criterion probabiy can be met. <br />Five of the seven criterion lisied above clearly cannot be rnet. A.ccardin� to Section 1125.02, <br />Suhdivision 2 of ihe Ci�y Code, a variance may be granted only when all o�the seven criteria are <br />met. <br />It�co�ernend�tiore: <br />Approv� Planning Commission Resolution 524-97, a resolution denying the variance request of <br />S�eve and Laura Lattrez to allow for a 33-foot wide curb cut, el�ven feet more than the maximum <br />allowed by Code. <br />N:IDATA1GFtOUPS1COMDEVIDEVCASES1563-971LATTREZ. VAR <br />