My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:33:48 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:06:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Speciat Meeting <br />AugusY 20, 1997 <br />Page 11 <br />Ca�rr►sssaoa� Jol�nston read from the PUD: "At the time of the development stage plan <br />review ihe City Council shall obiain a recommendation from Parks and Recreation <br />Commission and shall deiermine thai the property owner/developer shall b���:�:�a walkway <br />along part or all af the perimeter of the wetland prior to actin� or�:�k►e de��ti�pment stage." <br />Mr. �lack responded by saying that the trail issue <br />with the Citiy. At that time it was recommended tl� <br />land. ��� <br />�, <br />Ca�en�ssionex° 5te�er�son said that the commert�<:��e <br />Recreation didn't jeopardize the fee percentage fo�:1�� <br />added that Parks and Recreation wouid just as soetr�'�i' <br />would prefer that the irails be biice/walking/side�aalks, <br />Piaa�rae� Peters stated that it would <br />a loop around ihe wetland. Short o. <br />would be an acceptable option. ,,. <br />Commissio���° IVli�ler ask <br />Plataa►er Pe�ers responded <br />1997t;. <br />���i�������s�� �a���€t;::�';�� <br />be s�.��:;>:;_;:;;;:?;;,: <br />IOiir. ����<�:i��v;�����. "no". <br />say� <br />� <br />be a <br />of <br />meeting <br />in lieu oi <br />e so that Parlcs<:�i�s�:>��'' <br />r path development. He <br />';�a�.vner develop a path and <br />�>��roperty owners to do <br />along the easement <br />is stilI intact. <br />period would end September 23, <br />that any of the trees on the e�sting site couid <br />�a�ner P��ers ��:t�;;.��;;�s� review the plat. He stated Gateway Easemenis, Drainage and <br />CJtility Easerr�er�t�:;;�:���� of Way and Park Dedication Fees as issues that need to be <br />addressed before::;�ny action can be taken on the plan stage deveiopment by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />.,v:<: ti:v . <br />:i�{.�� <br />�'r��ii�° �,�,�����a asked the owner/developer if they had any questions or comments. <br />�°��d asked ihe Commission for its opinion on the project to date. <br />C[aaia° Peterson stated that it was his opinion that the old TJB building and the smail <br />office building are too close together and he hoped some�hing could be done aboui that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.