Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Comrnissioe� <br />Regular I�1eeCing <br />5eptember 3, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br />instead af the ori�inaily planned 16. The compiete re�ovation of the Red Oak apartments <br />is still included in the revised development plan. All �imensional requirements, drainage <br />and ponding, access and parking, iandscaping and easement issues have bee�i;�ddressed by <br />::z,;.�. <br />the applicani. He added that there are some clarifications thai ne�., to be;;�'i�,de in regards <br />to the originally planr�ed chain-link fence. ConsideratiQn shoulc�;;_����;�;:�iven to entering <br />into an easement with the neighboring property ta all�z��;�or a p�l��i�t��access to <br />e.,v` <br />Eastwood Road at the northeast corner of the nro�v_ ........_.__........... ..... <br />Associat� E�iesora addressed the Minor Subdivi <br />requirement wiIl need to be met. He stated th� E <br />survey would have to have proper documentatio <br />MSP Real Estate: the new Red Oak Apartment <br />area cross the lot line between the apartments a� <br />dwellings, and the driveway for the apartmepi�;:s? <br />townhomes lot, and a shared access dri .v„e�ia�? ���' <br />.�ssoegate ��•eesor� stated that S <br />a�prove Resolution 528-97, a re <br />request for MSP Real Estate�r�� <br />sub'ect to sti ulations. <.._';_;�`;`°' <br />J P :.;�_�>��r> <br />Asso�e�t� Ericso� <br />pro <br />nt <br />`he park dec���a���: <;;;><>:'>:;`>'" <br />uirements and`����:�es to the <br />ues needing io be resolved by <br />�#:Tached of�ce and recreation <br />�i�t;��r..the townhome <br />�;:�:����ated to the <br />'t�� �itl� the county. <br />';tl�:��'Ianning Commission <br />��iroval of a developmeni review <br />has approved the drainage plan, <br />it StafE`��: t�e��niiing that the Planning Commission <br />-f::::;:,ii::.:::y:�YCi::.. <br />a resoi����;���immending approvai of a minor subdivision <br />�o combine the rivo vacant parcels south of the apartmen�s <br />��::�-.esolved the two issues described above, subject to <br />��'Ja��u�ie�k����`��#>p��*:�i;��IYt o#`1NISP Real Estate, stated the development review before the <br />�ti�rtmissian me���<�#r�; ���irements of R3, R4 zoning. He added that the charge of the <br />�ommission is ta;a�p���e the development review based on the fact thai all code and <br />ordinances issues�:;:�ave been met. <br />Comar�issior���`�tevenson asked if there was an income level change based on a reduction <br />�r��n 16;,iq��ome units to 10; how many of the units will be of the subsidized t�pe. He <br />�1�€�;:���d�`�he applicant to address, for the public, the approximate rise in the reni that <br />�rt��!(c� take place because of the upgrade planned for the Red Oak Apartments. <br />I�Ie°. Piizkerfor� stated that the townhomes will rent for $650a$750 with the tenant paying <br />their own utilities. The apartment rates will go up to �520 for a one4bedrooen and $590 <br />fot two-bEdroom apartments. I�e added that the number of subsidized units is still ten, as <br />it was in the originai development. <br />