Laserfiche WebLink
.,. <br />Mounds View Planning Commissian September 3, 1997 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />iVlr. �e�ne�° asked if the staff is recommending approval of this project. <br />Ass�e�ate Es°icson stated that the staffis recommending approval of the pr���t because it <br />meets all of the necessary code and ardinance requirements as set:�qrth i�;:;��ie R-3 zaning. <br />'::4':: <' i�':♦ <br />He added that it is not the staffs charge to have subjective feelir���: ��t�-into the issue. <br />;.�;;;-;>v <br />w;<... <br />;;�;-�::>-���� «:: ;<><. <br />.�-»,.v <br />Judy �ea-matan, 8273 Easiwood, asked iithe pro���ty was zo�a��<�;��::�t��?,_co€�td the C��y <br />Y :<;:>:» ; .. . :;, s <br />go ai�out getting bids on commercial projecis for.;`�te site. Sh�}�niir�u�;:#��;�t�n�� if;t,li� <br />property was speci�ically r�zoned �'or MTr. Pinker�`i�tt:. ;=�p�y5. :;y�'��V <br />Chairperson Pe��rson stated that the currenrc zori�i�;;��;i:c���tated by the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />ltichard �et°inanra, 8273 Eastwood <br />common sense issues and "how many <br />if rezoning is the only optian then it s; <br />Co�rea�ission Obert stated that .:�� p. <br />as he wants and he has le�al.ri:`��'s as <br />Cha��°perso� Peters�n <br />C��:�i€��sioner <br />l� �f ��' e: t��; :::� i ty <br />______ <br />Cla�s�•���'�{���<���errso� <br />within,.�t�<>����: p���tad <br />ociate Er°i <br />Comm�ss�oner <br />Nos. 487-97 an <br />raised by the�.p� <br />the <br />that <br />stated f <br />�iod in <br />thai the'��;j: :':::>n��s io look at some <br />�:....,......: <br />_._..- - - - <br />��s the Cit�::a�allv need?" He added <br />to develop the property <br />not be done. <br />��lic that any application/request that comes <br />a yes-or-no decision has to be made by the City. <br />:his time period is 60 days and if a decision is not made <br />on.request is automaticaily passed; this is a Stafe law. <br />the MSP project deadline ends October 24, 1997. <br />eve�son said he wouid like to make a motion to table Plannin; Case <br />04-97 because of ail o£the opposition and questions that are being <br />�etersor� asked for a second to the motion, there was none. <br />Motion �ailed due to a lack of a second. <br />Motion/second: Brooks/Milier to recommend approval of Plarining Commisszon Resoluiion 528- <br />97, a resolution recommending approval of a development review for MSP Reai Estate, provided <br />the City Engineer has approved the drainage plan, subject to siipulations, as amended, and <br />