Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />Mounds View Planning Commission September li, 1997 <br />Speciai Meeting Page 3 <br />Iti was stated as a unatumous feeling by the Commission that the contractor, having done <br />business in the City of Mounds View in the past, knew t�at a permit was required. <br />Cot�tmiss�one�° �3ras�ere�[e stated his concem with setting a <br />foot variance over the allowable 22 feet. . <br />Motion/second: Brasaemle/Oberi to approve Planning Ct�� <br />resolution denying the variance request of Steve and Lau���L <br />curb cut, 11 feet more than the maximum atlowed by C�." <br />I�i�o I,aftr�z asked how much time the <br />in question. <br />Associate Erieson stated that the City <br />variance request was denied and that tl <br />for removing the work by the stipula��; <br />Cha'sr° Peterson asked for a vot��tin the <br />Motion carried: 5 ayes, 1 nay (Stev���it <br />;<t:;<<�' <br />Co�aea,xissio�er ,�t��u��s��`stated <br />: �>�>�;. :�::= ::<:: ;;:: <br />it i,� ���e work fo�';��i� :;���� to un� <br />E��i;:;; !;;;<::;:;:::.. � .� .:::::::: ::::.::::`;=;::.. <br />� ��.������v,a told � ��. �,��t�z. <br />so desir+�€�:;»>;»:.»:::::.::;:;. <br />v'�Yj, <br />6. ..... _ <br />ng Case I�To. 50� <br />b45 Highway 10 <br />�nt: MSP Real � <br />Subdivision r.�iu <br />} <br />the co <br />owing an l I- <br />� <br />ihe section of driveway <br />�ritir�g that the <br />] are responsible <br />>>against �he resolution on the arounds that <br />that has been done. <br />that she had the right of appeal to the City Council if she <br />for Silver Lake Commons to combine two vacant lots into one anto <br />� dwelIings woutd be constructed. <br />The applicant, MSP Reai Esiate, was present. <br />Associate E�°ieson briefly reviewed for the Commission the background on the above <br />requesi. I�e stated that the minor subdivision process, as de�aned in Section 1201.03 and <br />described in Chapter i202 of the City Code is required in tIiis situation to combine the <br />