My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:33:48 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:06:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 1Vlounds Veew Pta�a�in� Coa��Bssaa�a �Ic�vember 5, 1997 <br />R��ul�r M�etet►g Pa�� 3 <br />c. 5ummary of �he Ring Road Community Meetin�, 10/2�/9i <br />I�ir�ector Jo�ke addressed the Comrnissioners regarding the commuinty m. A g hetd ai <br />Pinewood Elementary School, which was attended by maxcy resi ' s. important <br />issues were discussed, most important of wiuch appea. ed to be �: the impacts to <br />nei�hboring residential districts. „ <br />COIi1SH1IS310Ii��° �b�� 15�Ce� Wj]8t WaS <br />Assoc�ate E�°e�so�a rcold the Commissioners that <br />and the property had iwo diff�rent appraisa�s: 03 <br />owner's appraiser. There is a$10,000 dollar dif <br />this difference will need to be resolved before tt� <br />This property is part of the housing replace„ .: <br />I)arec�or Jopk� added that the <br />Highway 10 redevelopment. <br />'I'he C��miss��nee°s <br />ring road concepi and <br />this time is just a conc <br />1������� ,T��ke <br />iax <br />�ng wit� th� <br />alked with a c <br />process is mo� <br />the <br />belonged �o t �" �hard's <br />s apprais�r and one by the <br />ihe two appra.isals and <br />:, ' ,. <br />io seil ihe property. <br />ai as part of the <br />�e nega • e f�ed b that ihe coinmunity is giving to the <br />ttus -:�cism is '�ht of the fact ihat #he ring road at <br />�� <br />, n�y, e <br />S i�'� '� <br />�`/ o���ir/� <br />>i��g��'�re had been some discussian with Char�ie <br />'�i" . id prope�i. Iv1r. �Iall had appraached ihe City requesting <br />>tan ' utd develap his banquet hail irt conjunction with the <br />A.s ii tt�``'�'{ �,�� <br />�;a:�� � banquet facility does not generate enou�h tax <br />��he kirit�. s�" ssistarice that he is looking for. Mr. Hall was made <br />:� c�s 2�d was told that a hotel deveIopment would be needed <br />�:, ., � . ._ <br />t�� facility to make the tax increment scenaria work. �Ir. Hali has <br />� m i��� > ; <br />�t�p���at wouid be interested in a ho#el projeci and the development <br />13ir°ectmr �o '� `suggesied that the City take stegs to investigate other possible <br />X, vela e. � atong County Road I� the properties adjaining the Mermaid site. <br />���� <br />Compreherzsive Ptan <br />Cmmrre�ss�o�aer ��o�l�s asiced if the Comprehensive Plan �eview would be dorre as a <br />re�ular part of the Planning Commission meeting agendas. <br />C�ayr° Pei�rsoa� stated thai ih� Cornprehensive Pla�l review pracedure is made part of th� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.