My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:33:48 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:06:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mou�ds �Iieav Pla�na�ireg Carteanisseo� Ocfobe�° 15, 1997 <br />�peei�l rneetireg Page 2 <br />4. Citizen Req�aests �nc� Comrra�nts on Ttems I�o� on tl�e Agend�r <br />No citizen requests or comments on items not on the agenda were cansider..�:>- <br />5. <br />Plar�ning Ca�e I�o. 505-97 <br />�asxx Program Avenue <br />Applicant: Everest Graup, Ltd. <br />Consideration o�Resolution No. 531-97 Regarding a N <br />into Qne for the Proposed Building N Development, M <br />Addition. <br />The applicant, Everest Group, Ltd., was <br />on (:ombiruri�:���'r'�Yarceis <br />usiness Fark East Second <br />Associate Ericson jave the Comzr��ssion a br��f�������t��d.report on the Planning Case <br />as follows: He told the Commis�;on that th�'origin�� siY� �lan was approved by the City <br />.:.�, <br />on October 24, 1994. At iha�;��ie the p.l�� was not:;��ed with Ramsey County within the <br />time frame ailowed. Becau;�:<��this f���`the site p���n needs to be reviewed aDain by the <br />Planning Com�nission an�;::��approvc�<1�y the C,i��?>�Council. <br />t� � ' <"`!'`' . - <br />:::.;,:.>;:..: :::.«: <br />���€��c� �ricsa�:<�����tl ta an (�cf���r<� `' 1997 Plannin <br />:. , g Conr�mmission meeting where <br />e°������� �acation, ����r�en� dedieat.'ion,�the possibility of additional right of way would <br />be ne��ie�,� ���� park dedic.���r� �c.e ar�d the reapproval of the Development review were <br />As�iat� E+;�'���a��!:;���i�;:;the Commission that these items have been addressed and the <br />::aiivner and the C��; ���r� come to terms on the above issues. It is Stai�'s recommendation <br />that the Planning'��tii��zission approve Pianning Cornmission Resolution No. 531-97, <br />recomtnending a��roval of the major subdivision request of Everest Group, Ltd., for the <br />Mounds View:Er�siness Park East 2nd Addition pian, with stipulations. <br />����° tVT�ller asked if the b�iiding footprint is the same square %otage as was on <br />plan. . <br />�.ss�ci�ate �ricson confirmed that it was, adcEing that ihe new development shows six <br />fewer parking spaces. He continued statinJ the decrease in parking spaces may be due to <br />increased drainage or runoff necessities. <br />. � --��.:'�_i <br />') <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.