My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:33:48 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:06:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1�ilounds �1i�e� Pl�nning Commissior� <br />Regular I�ileet�z�� <br />l�to�eratber 5, 1997 �. �, <br />Pag� 2 <br />Iiils. �ur�ing continued stating that the history of the parking ban was such that twenty <br />years ago parking was a problein because not ail of the praperties had drive�.ys for off- <br />street parking. Currer�tly all properties have ample driveway spa��;£or Cl��tr'own vehicies. <br />I�s. ��rding, toid the Coenmission that what she <br />parking be alEowed on the street during the day, v� <br />consideraiions that the resi of the City has. <br />Chair Peiea-son asiced IVIs. Burding if she had s�� <br />reques� and if not, the best approach would be to <br />placed on the City Councit agenda and deal direc; <br />Associate Ericson recommended that Ms. <br />Administrator, and thai he could help I�s;::, <br />direction. ..,.... <br />No other request or comments <br />5. �taff Reporis/Informatia.�?���ei�s <br />a. ,, City Counci <br />��t����::E�i�sott' <br />f rst ������ec� �, wet <br />Homes f�r: �� l�ts <br />questip��<:�;�€,€�:�?�: �:: <br />.. .. .::.......: ... . .�` <br />Lo���vvas��drr��fi`�t�;:� <br />��cond issue re �rc�; <br />.. � :-.�.,:: <br />'I'he resuhdivisiar�:>�� <br />b. City C <br />10/27 <br />fro <br />same <br />go to <br />!et the <br />;foris <br />snow <br />�ne frorn ihe ��t�;�ib�out the <br />City staff to get th� issue <br />�. <br />r�ty Council on the problem. <br />;�ing, the City <br />oving in the right <br />by Jim Ericson) <br />����s��el; two actioi�s of relevance to the Planning Commission. The <br />ar��3: ����r����n pernut and easement vacation requested by Gaod Vaiue <br />on Pt�1�:��?t���.�ircle. The City Council looked at the pians and had <br />the eas��i�t was dedicated in the first place. City Attorney Bob <br />a`:��earcfi''why the easement is there and wili report to the Ci . The <br />::::.:;:.. zY <br />:�:::�����verest Group major subdivision, which the Council passed. <br />���t t�e Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition, <br />Worksession, I 1/3/97 (Verbal Report by Rick Jopke) <br />,��p•ccfo�.;���rke addressed the Commissioners and reviewed a tist of agenda items that had <br />�e��'�:s�;�i�'ssed at the City Council worEcsession an I1/3/97. The items addressed inclucied <br />a���eral discussion with Representative Evans; a presentation of an engineering study <br />concerrung Che current City Ha[i, with the different options available to correct problems; <br />and the Ring Road development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.