Laserfiche WebLink
I�Iourads �lie�+ I'1anc�ing Corrarrt�ission l�ovember 19, I997 `�` ; <br />Sp�c�al IViee�ing P�ge 4 <br />7. The Rice Creek Watershed District appi•oved the required pernut on <br />October 22, 1997. <br />>...,... <br />8. The City Engineer has identified three issues ihat �tl neer�<:��5�be addressed <br />r::::::::`:;'. <br />before approvirrg fihe development. Th�se were,:�t�i�4�;:���=�oilows: <br />`<:>.;�,,. <br /><..::: <br />t�'- <br />a. Lack of distance betwee� tl�;�riiet and ou����>�'�� �€� :�]�'RP ond:;»�>`� <br />:::> :`:>.»��` P <br />on Lot 3. �<,;<_` ..:�;:.� <br />;<�<� .<z<�'>3;: <br />b. �nsure that the culverts >�,.::. ,�,,.. �. <:::�::::::<<;;;:<»:>�,.. :,.�;:;:> <br />��r the ��;>�aul Watei��!��S>;�"����:�� <br />wa fiinction ro rl <br />Y <br />e <br />P P Y� <br />c. Ensure that emer�ency ove�`�i��;:�i:i:�n the NURP pond�on lot 4 is <br />directed away from the unc��'�;rt�iu.�;��t��es and toward the street. <br />These issues are addressed as:;�':a��itions ot`�p��°��?�:I �fl Planning <br />Commission Resolution ��r::;��<�=.��`�>�.. <br />9. The light fixture ty �'�inissin ;�i�2ti�;:���:��'� -�i�t'� ro osal were addressed <br />�:;: �.,. ..::>.: �;:: P P <br />and the applicant;,�3�esented::��tnples't�����`fixtures for the Commission's <br />review. <br />Planr�er Peters stated th�;��iere are:�i��icerns a,l�tit off-site glare, The deveioper o�the <br />�. <br />Holici�.y Stationsior�::;�s>��en aske�;��:;����<'���+iays in which this gtare could be reduced. <br />N�,;�;'"�ptometric<_����s;,were rrs�:��>����C��le for the Commission to review. This <br />�:::::. <br />�� ;:�:»::::� -1� w. �.< <br />,;> <br />�� �,� s an ���S�c��i�ate 50 percent reduction in glare with the use of a baf�le <br />sys��,t�. . <br />Chucl�..�:��~���`t��ve(o er`':�i:�essed the Cammission and said that ihe Iare couid be <br />�::: P > g <br />recj�;��t� �iy ti1ie;;i�;�;�'�;:�af�Ie system and presented this baf�le system to the Commission <br />�i3�'�their review`` <�'> <: ;`!;;:`` <;; ; `>;.,; <br />Planner �eie�°s �tated that it is SRF's recommendation to use the baffle system and <br />consider a thre�:��iionth review that is based on the Ievel of complaints that are znade by <br />the area resid...�#�C�s to the glare of the Iights and the baf�le system. <br />���°�`;::���rid reminded the Comrnission that a well-Gt store is a safer store. <br />��anner Peters continued: <br />10. Snow storage areas not identified on the original pian have been identified. <br />One problem stiII e�cisting is the snow storage for Lot 4 is shown within the <br />