Laserfiche WebLink
��'iCSf)Il, Ji�i1 ' <br />From: Clark, Bill -- <br />Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:15 PM ;' <br />io: Ericson, Jim <br />�ubject: RE: Visibility <br />,lim, <br />I am in totaE agreement with the clear vision requirement. in some states it is law. Mosf major (7-91, High's, efc) aEl night <br />fast t/a's have internal regs fhaY state the same, lt gives us access visualiy on just a drive by and helps to defer robberies <br />and ofiher activities, Thanks for asking. <br />Bill Clark <br />-----Origina[ Message----- <br />Frorn; Ericson, ]im <br />sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:12 PM <br />To: Clark, Biif <br />Subject; Visibiliry <br />Chief: <br />The Planning Commission is reviewing its sign cade ordinance and has a specific question regarding window signs. <br />Currently the Code does not regula4e signage aFfixed fo a window ofi a commercial establishment. The Commission <br />would like 4o regulate such signage for aesthetic reasons and possibly far reasons coneerning public safety. Would <br />you feel it impaprfanfi if possibEe to leave an area of a business' window free from signs sd as to not obscure ar hide <br />fihe activity within the s#ore? I�, if there was a rabbery in progress at a liquor store, perhaps someone outside or an <br />officer would be betfer able to observe this were it not for fhe proiiieration of window signage. ihe Commission is <br />suggesting that na signage be aflowed upon a window if between an elevation of 4-6 feet off the fioor. What are your <br />thoughts on thaf? <br />Jim <br />', <br />