Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commissian <br />17e�ular IV€eeti�g <br />Februaiy 7, 2001 <br />Page � <br />Director Ericson explained the point was meant to be if there is a ground to ceiling <br />window the business would be allowed to have signage no further than four feet off the `: <br />ground. If a business has a window four (4) feet hzgh and three (3) feet off the;ground far <br />a total of seven (7) feet off the ground then the business would be allowed one {1} foot af <br />signage area. The Icey is to maintain an area for visibility for public'"safety concerns. The <br />ianguage in the ordinance allows 25% of the window fio be covered provided the four (4}. <br />foot requirement is �net. <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he had a comment from an iri� <br />concerning public safety with window signa�e. This person <br />section of the window available for visibility for the public � <br />at a gas station <br />f�e station left a <br />>ue:; ; <br />Director Ericson said the cade could define what portion of the window <br />left clear of signs for visibility issues. He stated he would.look at ather <br />see how they regulaie window signage for pubiic,safety,issues.;;;, <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he felt ihe Commission had <br />window signs for public safety concerns <br />Director Ericson indicated on Page <br />off tha language allowing Council, <br /><_,� meet the sign code requirements ,°7 <br />=__ applicatian for anything nat allowe <br />Chair Stevenson xequesfe <br />Development Director be <br />CommissionerMi�ler ask <br />, <br />Director Ericson indicatei <br />Commissioner Miiler qiie <br />vuould fall under the code <br />to be <br />to <br />the <br />under Issuaiice of PermiY'Conditions Staff crossed <br />issue special'approval for a pennit thai does not <br />�is section �ivas re-worded io require a variance <br />by code <br />n stating a permit will be granted by the Corrimunity <br />state tl�e Community Development Department. <br />the fi�ues on Page 10 Section (H}. <br />came out of the current code. <br />where signs referring to where a chureh is located <br />r Erieson explairied it would fall under directional signs and directional signs are <br />located in, the right of way. <br />''pointed out the code does not allow directional signs in R1 and R2 <br />Director Ericson indicated the code could be changed to allow no direciional signs on a <br />residential property. <br />Chair Sievenson suggested adding a notaiion allowing for directional sigms in the right of <br />vvay only in Rl and R2 districts with approval of the appropriate governmentai agency. <br />' <br />