Laserfiche WebLink
Il�Io�ands View Planning Coa�ramission <br />12egular 1VIeetang <br />Febraary 21, 2Q01 <br />Page 9 <br />- provide a direct counseling service. Mr. Jalcer then outlined a few things his organization does <br />%r the state of Minnesota as a client. <br />Steve Doughty, the architect on the proj ect, showed a color drawing of the proposed building. <br />The architect stated the building is currentiy in the design developinent stages and is on schedule <br />to have construction docuxnents completed soxnetime around the fizst of April. He indicated they <br />are hoping to break ground as soon as road restrictions are lifted. <br />Mr. Doughty explained this is a single story affice building with a possible expansion'to the <br />sou#hwest on the lot which is a horizontal expansion of the�bui�ding arid a third phase would be a <br />�vertical expansion of the building of approximately 6000 square feet over the original portion of <br />the building. <br />Mr. Doughty pointed out they are trying to maintain the residential <br />design far the building but noted the verti�cal expansion will go up ; <br />the ridge line of �he shingled roof `. " ;... <br />Mr. Doughiy explained the materials to be used for the <br />pre-cast base beiow the windows and a type" of commei <br />< . ,:; <br />to the roof eaves. '` <br />Mr. Doughty stated he was rece� <br />_' the setback issue. Ir� an effort to <br />the buildin� bacic 50 feet. There <br />past the <br />aiternat�ve pian �n an eiror <br />record, his clieilt ��vould be <br />located an the"pro�erCy.. <br />Commissioner;Mill�r aske <br />building; � � > <br />Mr: Dau�htv stafed the pa� <br />then explainec <br />and the expan; <br />s <br />the <br />; area with the <br />2 feet above <br />�.ck material with a <br />head of the vvindows <br />ide aware of the concerns of the property owner �egarding <br />good faith he pravided another site plan ihat would pull <br />t stiIl be ari �:dd1tioiia120 feet of the proposed building out <br /><, .. :. <br />cild�ng but he stated ius client would agree to this <br />the other property awner. Mr. Doughty noted, for the <br />lditional costs to bring in more fill due to the wetland <br />ive site plan would itnpact the parking lot for the <br />{u�g lot would be the same with the building in either location. 1VIr. <br />;y°`intend to buzld, grade and provide enough parking fo� the c�arrent <br />with this first phase. <br />Johnson inquired as tfl how much additional fill would be required if the building <br />►ck on the site. <br />estimated the additional cost for fi11 to be between �4,000 a�id $10,000. <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired as to whether moving the building would affect the holdzng pond. <br />; <br />Mr. Doughty stated the holding pond would not be affected i�y moving the buiiding back. <br />