My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I1�[o�ands Vrevv Pl�nni�g Cornmi�sioz� <br />l�e�t��a�° IVleetin� <br />I�arc� 7, 2001 <br />Page 11 <br />Director Ericson also asked the residents to come to the neYt meeting. <br />6o Spec�a� Plan�ing Case l�o. SP-082-00 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained this is the fourth comprehensive revision <br />of the sign code. He then reviewed the changes made to this zevision of the�code with the '. <br />Commission to make sure the changes accuraiely reflected what was discussed. He also .". <br />discussed the various changes to the code the City Attorney had recornmended. <br />It was the consent of the Commission to change the la� <br />an inflatable device be no more than 30 feet above ihe <br />It was the consent of tha Commisszon to hold a public; <br />changas to ihe sign code. <br />7o Staff 12eports <br />a. Preeious Council <br />Comrr�unity Development Dir� <br />Pinewood Elernentary, the bui <br />to setbacks, and notentiallonQ <br />vay 1 <br />Community <br />various firm <br />be intervzew <br />proj ect: `` He then notec <br />before it to award that <br />�Fthe code slightly to require that <br />to whicli it �s;.attached. <br />on April 4, 2(}01` to'discuss <br />ir Ericson z�ofied'Council ciiscussed at the worlc session <br />ig on Highway 1 � and,the concerns raised by Mr. Winiecici as <br />ige redeveloprnent on Highway 10. <br />Steeriug Cotnmittee <br />Director Er.icson reported the City has receivecl six (6) proposals from <br />�vay l 0 redevelopment project. Three of those firms were selected to <br />trrowed the list down to one firm that staff feels is best suited for the <br />� w�ll be a year long process and that Cauncil will have a Resolution <br />at the next meeting. <br />� Ericson stated;;he is looking fox three people for ihe Highway 10 Redevelopment <br />; Committee stating Commissioners Johnson and Stevensan had expressed an interest in <br />on the Comniittee. He then noted there is one meeting a month on a Wednesday and that <br />li be three representatives from each conunittee along with some members of the <br />� cominunity, and the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer. <br />c. Cancellatao� of the IV1ar�h 21, 2001 �Vleeiang <br />Commnnity Developxnent Director Ericson noted that, as there is unfinished business for the <br />March 21, 2001 meeting it will not be cancelied. He then noted he vvi11 be out of tawn and, as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.