Laserfiche WebLink
Sign Code Review <br />January t 7, 2fl0I <br />Page 2 <br />Page I5. Old Subd. 5 relocated to 1008.08, Subd li under general sign requirements. Oid Subd. 6 relocated to <br />( I 008.08) new Section 1008.09, Specific Sign Type Standards. Old Subd. 7 has been eIuninated, as roof signs <br />are now considered rohibited. <br />1'age 16. Old Subds. 8 and 9, Wall Signs and Temp Signs, respectively, are relocated to ne�� Section I008.09, <br />(1008.08) S ecific Si T e Standards. <br />Page 17. Old Subd. 10, BilIboards, is relocated to new Section 1008.09, Speci�c Sign Type Standards. <br />(]008.08) <br />Page 18. Otd Subd, 1 l, Campaign Signs, is relocated to new Section ]008.09, Specific Sign Type Standards. <br />taa8.os� <br />Fage 19. ,5ection 1008.09, Specific Sign Type Standards, is new, created from other code passages. Subd. 1 <br />(1008.09} relates to Ground Signs. Crround signs need to be set back 15 feet. (Is this too much?) Subd, lf <br />altows for more than one ound si . Please review these new re uirements <br />Page 20. Subd. 2. addresses wail signs. For the most part, the Ianguage is the same yet Subds. 2c, 2d and 2e <br />(1008,09) address wali si altowances as the differ b zonin district. <br />Page 2fl. Subd. 3. relates to Projection signs. Again, for the most part, the language is the same yet Subd. 3f is <br />(1008.09} new, rohibitin swin in or swa in ro'ection si s. <br />Page 21 Subd. 4 Relates to Temporary signs. Only minor changes have been made: Increase of xnax sign <br />(1008.09) area frorn 32 to 48 square feet and a recalculation of hanner area ailowance in Subd, 4b. Subd. 5 is <br />new and relates to Window si ns. Is a 25% max covera e er window ane too restrictive? <br />Page 23. Subd. 6 is Billboards. No changes here except withir► Subd, 6i, Destruction, where an"act of God" <br />1008.09) has been re laced with "an act of nature." <br />Page 23. Subd. 7 is Campai� signs. Minneso#a statutes indicate municipalities may not restrict size and <br />(1Qfl8.09) location of such si s. Should we eliminate this section or maintain it unchan ed? <br />Page 23. This is a new section regarding miscellaneous reqnirements, Subd. 1 relates to allowing signs for <br />(1008.10) Churches and other non-��esidential uses in a residential district. <br />Page 24. Subd. 2 is relocated from Old Section 1008.08 Subd. 3. Subd. 3 is new and relates to Garage Sale <br />(1008.10) szgns and the Iike. What do you think? Subd 4 is also new, allows for area identification signs. <br />{Refer to the definition.) Look ok? <br />Page 25 Subd. 5 is new and refers to Prohibited Signs. FIaslung signs are now prohibited, as are roof signs. <br />(1008. I0) Tem or "lose wei ht" and "work from home" si s are now ex licitl rohibited. <br />Page 25 This section is "Sig�z Variances." Rather than individually listing the variance cziteria, the <br />1008.13) subdivision sim 1 refers to Cha ter 1125 of the Zonin Code. <br />Communication & Notification; On January 24, 2001, Sta#3F seni out more than 125 le�ters tco <br />Mounds View businesses alerting ihem to the fact that the Planning Commission was reviewing <br />the Sign Code. A copy of this letter is attached for your reference. Also, the Chamber of <br />Commerce sent out a notification io its membership base indicating the Commission's revie�v of <br />the Sign Code. The City's website has been updated to include a page relating to the proposed <br />sign code revision which can be viewed at http://tcfreenet.or /�or�/nnoundsview/signcode.htm. <br />Last, staff has requesfied that information be scrolled on the City's cabie channei, Channei 16. <br />5chedule: According io the review schedule, the Planning Commission is to review tlze temporary <br />sign requirements at its next meeiing on February 17, 2001. While if is anticipated �hat a final <br />drafl: of the Si�n Code could be ready for presentation at the first meeting in March, staflFwill <br />schedule the public hearing for the second March rzxeeting. Assuming no further changes are <br />needed, the Sign Code would be placed on ihe Council's Apri12°� worksession agenda, with first <br />and second readings scheduled for April 9�' and Apri123`a <br />A:1Sign Code Report - Feb 7, 2000.doc <br />