2001 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

Mezzenga Development Revzew January 3, 2001 Page 2 Dimensional Reguirements: �uilding Setbacics: � Front {Co. Rd. I.): � Front {Greenfield): � Side (Wesi): • Side �South}: Parking Lot Setbacks: � Froni {Co. Itd. I.): � Front (Greenfield): • Side {West): � Side (South}: Parking Requirements: • Allowed: • Proposed: • Maximurn office space: Re u9 ired Pro op sed: Met ? 30 feet 21 feet No 30 feet 92 feet i'es 10 feet'� 5 feet No 10 feet* 20 feet Yes 10 feet* 10 feet� 5 feet 15 feet�" 16 feet 29 fe�t 50 feet 20 feet Yes Yes Xes Yes 1 per 200 square feet of leasable office space area* 14 spaces 2,800 Square Feet �` 'I'hese reqairements are as ailowed by Resolu�ion 633-00, a resolution approving a variance for reduced baiIding and parking (ot setbactcs. i The site plan submitted for review, as indicated in the dimensional requirements above, is not =" campletely consistent with the approved variance or with applicable City Code. The buiidin� is set back 21 feet from County Raad I—it should be no less than 30 feet. In addition, the buzlding is shown to be set back 5 feet from the west property iine—it should be 10 feet. The site plan will need to be revised accordingly. Parkin�: The approved variance ailows for a reduced �arking ratio--one space per every 200 square feet of leaseabie office space or fraction thereof. The si�e plan indicates 14 stalls which wauld translate into a maximum Ieaseable office area of 2,8Q0 square feet. Because the submitted floor plans do not indicate a scale or show interc�al room dimensions, staff was unable to determine if the parking spaces were adequate for the building. The floor plans.will.need to be revised to show scaie, dimensions, and a computation for the totalleaseable office area. In addition, the site plan shall be revised to be complian� with ADA parking requirement�. The City Code requires that a perimeter curh be installed for parking areas in a business dista-ict. This wi11 need �o be shown on the plans. Li�htin� The site plan does not indicate that any exterior lighting wil� be used with this development. Staff suspects thati this is probably noY the case and will ask the appiica�afi to personally speak ta this issue at the meeting. Staff wauld recommend that if parking lot lighting is to be utilized, that it be accomplished by mountin� low-intensity flood lights upon the building to shine downward upon the loi consisteni vt�ith ihe City Code pertaining to lighting and glare (Chapter 1103 of the Zoning Cade.)