Laserfiche WebLink
. � <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />3. Approval of Minutes <br />a. May lb, 2001 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Kaden/Hegland. <br />Presented. <br />Ayes — 6 <br />June 2Q, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br />To Approve the May 16; 2001, Meeting Minutes as <br />, ::`` <br />Nays =`;0,.: Motion carried. :' <br />;: <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on .t� <br />There were no resident comments on items not on the agerida. <br />5. Planning Case No. VROl-005 <br />Planner Atkinson noted that this matter <br />for <br />� � ;; <br />� <br />, �=. <br /><"` i <br />�� t <br />S: �; ,, <br />Y,E�i.. <br />:`�. t_ �,N ... . . <br />,j.....: . p- <br />Planner Atkinson noted that the applicant had requested a variarice to build an accessory <br />structure on the property line and nofed that City �Code require"s that accessory structures be <br />located at least five (5) feet off the:property line. <br />Planner Atkinson noted thaY there��vere seven cnter.�a;that must be rnet in order for the Planning <br />Commission to� grant a variauce -` �' �"` <br />Planner Atkinson noted that the fi�st criteria_ is that exceptional or extraordinary circumstances <br />apply to the property,ywhtch do not apply;generally to the other properties in the same zone or <br />vicini#y and result fi-om 1ot ;size or sliape;' topography or other circumstances over which the <br />owners o� ltlie property hay�1 bad.;no control. He then noted tl�at the property is located at 5532 <br />St. Stephen Street and i�"ia"t�ough lot with street frontage on both St. Stephen Street and Jackson <br />Drive. He further noted the;�lot is relatively flat and free from any significant circumstance that <br />co.uld be considered exc.ep'tioiial or extraordinary. <br />u�ner Atkinson noted'that the second criteria is that the literal interpretation of the provisions <br />this Title would,.�eprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the <br />ne disinct under'fhe terms of this Title. He then noted that the setback requirements for <br />esSory structures are the same for all residentially zoned lots within the City and no different <br />m:those imposed on the subject property. <br />Plannez Atkinson noted that the third criteria is that the special conditions or circumstances do <br />not result from the actions of the appiicant. He then noted that there appears to be no special <br />conditions ar circums�ances on this property. <br />, <br />; <br />,' <br />