My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Anima! Haspital <br />July 18, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br />conditional use permit to the City Council. Staffhas prepared Resolution 664-01 that the Planning <br />Commission may choose to act on if they feel that appraval of the conditional use permit is the <br />appropriate course of action. If the Commission feels that adverse affects on the neighborhood would <br />be too great to warrant approval, they should direct staff to draft the appropriate Resolution for action <br />at the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 1, 2001. <br />Code Amendment Re uest <br />The applicants have indicated their desire to board animals at their proposed new facility. The City <br />Code, however, currently does not allow the boarding of animals within the City except for short <br />periods of time and only when associated with surgery, illness, or injury. Therefore, an amendment <br />to the Code is necessary to allow this service. <br />The City Code treats amendments in a similar fasluon to condi#ional use permits. As with conditional <br />use permits, the Planning Commissionmust considerpossible adverse affects of the amendment. The <br />findings of the Planning Commission sha11 be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: <br />• Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />• The Geographical Area Involved <br />• Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br />•?'he Character of the Surrounding Area <br />'=''--�f The demonstrated need for such a use <br />. <br />The sp.ecific text amendment as described below would only apply to B-2 zoning districts. With <br />many B-2 districts in the City, the adverse affects relating to the geographical area and surrounding <br />area as listed above is difficult to measure generally. It can be said, however, that all B-2 zoning <br />districts are located along County Highway 10. Therefare, when considering adverse affects to an <br />area, the Planning Commission must look at what negative affects would be created if an animal <br />boarding facility were present along County Highway 10. Alsa, since the amendment is proposed as <br />a conditional use, any proposed animal boarding facility must be approved by the Planning <br />Commission and City Council, at which time further conditions may be placed on the approval if the <br />specific location warrants them. <br />Chapter 1113.04 5ubdivision 4 of the City Code allows veterinary and animal clinics as a conditional <br />use in B-2 zoning districts but prohibits animal boarding except for when associated with surgery, <br />illness, or injury. This section can be amended to allow animal boarding if the Planning Commission <br />feels animal boarding is an appropriate use. The following change would allow animal boarding as a <br />conditional use in B-2 zoning districts: <br />Chapter 1113.04 <br />Subd. 4. Veierinary clinics, � animal clinics, and animal boardirxg facilities; provided, that: <br />a. Noise and odor are effectively confined to the premises in accordance with Chapter 607 of <br />this Municipal Code, Nuisances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.