Laserfiche WebLink
... , <br />; .... <br />._: . <br />. .. .. ... .. ..: ..�� k ....-.... . .., . <br />Mounds View Planning Comrnission June 4, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />Mr. Westlund asked if the address of Sham-O-Jet was significant. Chairman Stevenson stated <br />that it was not significant, <br />Director Ericson noted the recommendation is not to allow R-2 zoning along Long L,ake Road. <br />He explained the twin home would face County Road L <br />Mr. Westlund asked what was the timeline for approval. - <br />Chair Stevenson said that all decisions would be made in a'timely manner. He suggested tlie <br />Commission discuss the four recommenda#ions on the Staff Re ort -;, <br />� ,>.: <br />Chairman Stevenson closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Miller questioned whether lot 4 could be made longer as:1V!'r: �`iuStafson had <br />proposed, even though it is longer than staff had originally r�commended <br />.�. . < ; <br />Direc�or Ericson stated the length could be ariioptic <br />on the agenda for discussion at this meetingi' Only <br />be split was not <br />at this meeting. <br />��r� ;�.°' i �� ; � � � <br />���� � � .. <br />Commissioner Kaden stated he did nc�'t``�ant any,�o�`the lots to l3e designated as R-2. He <br />mentioned he had spoken out on tlus�,issue at the,last meeting`';' �Ie clarified he came to the <br />conclusion that the R-2 designatiQri�would be ac�e�table to'him on County Road I, but his <br />viewpoint Was that he wasn't"con���inced the R 2 designation would be appropriate for lots 1 and <br />;v � �� , <br />2 fronting Long Lake Road� ,, �� �;' ��� : <br />,;°gax' K�9,s�,f,§� ,i Sg�s"�� <br />5 <br />Mr. Gustafso�:xead:the lot dimensions and commented that they all rneet the minimum <br />requirements. ,;: �'�yk <br />��� "��. <br />n �� <br />Chair Stevenson asked Director Encso�i`=what the dimensions of lots 1 and 2 should be. Director <br />Ericson said they sliould be!;75,feet each. He added that the exact location of lot lines would be <br />discussed at a later meet�ng'and.tlie purpose of this meeting was to determine which lots could be <br />zon�� R-2. <br />�� � . <br />��� � <br />1VIr. Gustafson stated that`if all the lots were not rezoned, then he wanted none rezoned. He <br />exited the meeting at.7�'S0 p.m. <br />� <br />�ar. <br />Co�ssioner-Hegland questioned if alI these lots are one property. Director Ericson responded <br />1t, is all :one properiy, but split into three lots. <br />�_;, - <br />Commissioner Hegland stated the Iot lines are important since the discussion is no longer around <br />the same lot. He stated he felt the proposal should be supported, but the lots should not be <br />allowed to be longer than 135 feet. He added that lot 4 should not be allowed to be deeper for <br />any reason. <br />