My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br />- -.. . . - :;: .. .., . <br />..- � - . <br />_: <br />-- _. <br />:: <br />:.., <br />,. <br />,. _. _- __ , . -- <br />_ _ <br />:._ . <br />, . . _ _. --- <br />, <br />Mounds View Planning Co <br />' mmission <br />Regular Meeting <br />September 5, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br />Mr. McCarver explained that his company has an internal approval process that deterniines <br />whether a sign would be objectionable to a reasonable and prudent person. He;then indicated <br />that in the past his company has turned away adult entertainment a�vertising as they feel it would <br />be objectionable and they intend to continue to do so. <br />Commissioner Johnson asked how high the brick face was on,�the Wynnsong Theater sxgn. <br />Community Development Director Ericson approximated the height to be four feet. <br />Commissioner Hegland asked if the City is obligated to allow �the� applicant to expand its sign as <br />it is fairly large already and, if made larger, it will dominate that stretc� of �ounty Highway 10. <br />Community Development D'uector Er�cson explained. khat �the sign is nari±canforming only in the <br />sense that i# is located in the wrong spot. He then m�icated that he interprefs the code to mean <br />that tl�e City is obligated to allaw tYie sign to be_expaiided �Ie further indioa��ed #hat if, in order <br /><,,� <br />to expand, the applicant would need to enlarge�'its easemen��he Cz'ty �voul"d not be obligated to <br />agree to that. s a�:" �:a' �� J��`��.;=i ..t. <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated <br />e�pansion of the sign. <br />\a Community;Developme: <br />, <br />City Attozney.�who agref <br />� <br />° �;�,. <br />Commiss�orier 1Vlxller nc <br />Commwruty Developme <br />discussion if the�Clty all <br />does notsthirile the anblic <br />�� <br />that the`City is obligated to allow the <br />ie had discussed the matter with the <br />situation. <br />only billboard without a sunset clause. <br />�,, Directoi��ncs�on=noted that may be �-ue but said it could be a topic of <br />Ns:for the u�e of its land to expand the sign. He further stated that he <br />u�:would be in favor of a sunset clause but said the matter could be <br />addre5sed. d �-� <br />rk N <br />s {� '� � <br />C.oinmissioner Hegland q�estioned <br />the applicant. <br />�° h-" <br />whether the City had discussed making the sign smaller with <br />"�oii�munity�Develo�ment Director Ericsan indicated that he and the applicant had discussed, at <br />l�iigt�;.the size-o��e sign and have determined that there are standazd sizes to billboards and the <br />r.equested szgn�:is the next size up from the size of the existing billboard. <br />-e} ;v <br />Mr. McCarver explained that there are a couple of different standard sizes and the next size up <br />from the one requested is 20 x 60, which his company felt was too large for the area. <br />Chairperson Stevenson asked how the size of the billboard would compare to the proposed golf <br />course signs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.