Laserfiche WebLink
. - .. <br />, .. <br />Itern # 7 <br />City of Mounds View <br />Planning Comm�ssion Report <br />Meeting Date: October 17, 2001 <br />Title: PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION OF A VARTANCE REQUEST TO <br />ALLOW A FENCE OF SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN <br />THE FRONT YARD OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5150 IltONDALE <br />RQAD; PLANNING CASE VRO1-01 b <br />Introduction <br />The subject property is a corner lot Iocated at 5150 Irondaie Road. The applicant, Steve Stimmler, is <br />proposing to construct a fence six (6) feet in height in the front yard of the property. <br />Discussion <br />According to the Municipal Code, Section 1103.08, Subdivision 3, fences of a height greater than 48 <br />inches (4 feet) are not allowed in the front yard of a property. The City Code defines a front yard as <br />`:.�� the azea of a lot that extends beyond the front face of the principal structure and is adjacent to a <br />-- ' street. Therefore, corner lots, such as in this case, have two (2) front yards. As shown on the attached <br />site plan, the proposed fence wouid be located beyond the northern building line of the principal <br />structure. <br />According to the applicant, there is a need for a fence due to the amount of activity conducted in <br />their back yard. A fence would greatly reduce the impact on neighboring properties as well as protect <br />the privacy of the applicant's family. The applicant has �lso indicated that they would like to install a <br />pool in the rear yard. The Building Cade, however, requires that. at Ieast a five (5} foot fence be <br />placed around swimming pools. If the applicant were to comply with the building code and the <br />zoning code, there would not be adequate space for a swirruning paol. <br />For this Variance to be approved, as with any Variance request, there needs to be demonstrated <br />substantial hazdship or prac�ical difficulties associated with the property that makes a literal <br />interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes <br />require �hat the governing body (the Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each <br />application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in <br />Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists <br />when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria are as follows: <br />a. Exceptional or extraordinary circamstances apply to the property which do no� apply <br />- generaUy to other proQerties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or <br />shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since <br />the effective date hereof have had no control. <br />