Laserfiche WebLink
.. , <br />.. . .. . � ' . - <br />The proposed variance would not result in any of the above-cited adverse effects. <br />`' Based on staffls review of the request and the code requirements, it appears that there is sufficieilt <br />unique hardship and practical difficuities associated with this property to warrant approval of the <br />variance requested. The Planning Commission, however, should discuss the issues presented in the <br />report and any other information presented by the applicant oz other property owners and determine <br />if approval of the variance is warranted. <br />Recommendation <br />Af�er holding the public hearing and discussing this reqtaest with the properiy owner, staff would <br />recommend that the Planning Commission review the testimony and the seven criteria to determine <br />if there is a legitimate basis for granring this Variance request. Resolution No. 674-01, a resolution <br />approving the variance, has been included with this report for the Planning Commission to act upon <br />if they feel approval af the variance is warranted. <br />Jim Atkinson <br />�' ` � Planning Assaciate <br />- 763-717-4022 <br />Attachments: <br />1. Application <br />2. Site Plan <br />3. Resolution No. 674-01 <br />i <br />� <br />