My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />October 17, 2001 <br />Page 16 <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated he felt the City needed to be consistent and, since the City gave <br />assurances that the access road wo�ld not be used for anything other than emergency access, he <br />feels the City should stand by that statement. <br />Planner Atkinson asked the Commission to make its direction clear. <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated he felt granting ihe variance could open up a can of worms. <br />Commissioner Miller asked Commissioner Zwirn to elaborate. <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated the past position of the Commission has been to indicate that the <br />access drive would not be used for anything other than exnergency purposes. He then indicated <br />that allowing the applicant to use it for a dr�veway goes against what was previously promised to <br />the residents. _ <br />Conunissioner Scotch asked if it was possible #o gain access off of Spring Lake Road. <br />Mr. Diehl indicated he was not sure but said it would require tearing down at least 20 mature <br />trees. <br />Community Deveiopment Director Ericson indicated thai_tlie City's Code requires a minimum of <br />75 feet of fr.ontage. He then indicated that, in previous discussions with the applicant, it was <br />explained that access was not possible without some kind of cul-de-sac being installed. He then <br />indicated that, if Mr. Dieh1 were wilIing to put in the cul-de-sac, the City would not be able to <br />deny the request io subdivide the property. He further indicated that whether or not to allow <br />access onto the City right of way is a policy decision. <br />Corrimunity Developmer�t D.irector Ericson indicated that he felt there should be some type of . <br />real access by way of a street improvement but said, in the past, the City has allowed access onto <br />City right of way. <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if 1VIr. Diehl had attempted to purchase enough property from the <br />property owner to the south to put in the czxl-de-sac. <br />IVIr: Diehl indicated he had not actually gotten into a monetary discussion with the property <br />owner to the south but said she was not interested in discussing the matter with him. <br />Gommissioner Johnson clarified that Knollwood Drive is not actually a street but a City right of <br />way. <br />Chair Stevenson indicated that installing a cul-de- sac would be the best solution. <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he was not sure how to give direction on this matter as the <br />Commission does not want to change the accessibility of the access drive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.