My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Nfou�ds View Plaa��ai�� Cornynission J�uuary 6,1999 <br />l�egula�° 1l�e�ti�� Page 2 <br />Motion/Second: Brasaemte/Stevenson to approve the December 2, 19�8, meeting minutes as <br />corrected. <br />Ayes _ 6 Nays - 0 <br />The mation carried. <br />5. <br />Pia�an��a� Case 1�Io. s40-98 <br />Property involved: 8444 CYreenwood Drive <br />Consideraiion of Resolution No. 567-99, a Resolutian Recommending Approval of a Minor <br />Subdivisian Requesi to Divide the Property Located at 8444 Greenwoad Drive in�o Two Parceis. <br />Applicant: Dan Danielson <br />The applicant was not present. <br />Ericson reported that applicant, Dan Danielson, is requesiing a minor subdivision of k�is parents' <br />lot at 8444 Crreenwood Drive. The lot is 23S feet along Greenwood Drive and it is 234 feet deep. <br />They pxopose to split aff #he south 78 feet of the Iot on which the applicant would buiid a new <br />home, for wiuch he has submitted buildi�ig plans. The parcels creafied meet the city's minimum ;} <br />lot size requirenrxents and also meet the frontage xequirements. The lot would be somewha� <br />smaller than the homes #hat are in the area--most are about IQO feet, although there ax�e some <br />smaller lots. The certi%cate of survey was reviewed by the city engineer and public works <br />department who indicated it was acceptable with the addition of easements being dedicated. In <br />addition to the required easements, the other change needed for the certificate is to add a <br />signature blacic bearing the names of the property owrzers and the mayor and city <br />clerk/administrator. <br />Ericson continued by staiing that the other issue that needed to be discussed concerned park <br />dedication requirements. Because this property is larger than 1 acre, the city code specifies that a <br />park dedicat�on fee , in an amount equal ta 10% of the land value, be paid. According to Ramsey <br />Countq, the land is valued at $47,700. Ten percent of tha� wauld be $4,770. The Code also <br />specifies that the dedicafiion fee applicable ta land under an existing home can waived, which <br />reduces the dedication �.tnount 66 percent, to $1,574. <br />Ericson reco�nmended the Planning Commission approve Resolution 567-99, a resolution <br />recommending approval of this minor subdivision request to the City Council, wrth stipulations. <br />The first stipulation is that the certiiicate of survey be revised as indicated prior to the Council <br />approving it, also that the applicant make a park dedication payment in the amount specified, <br />$14i5, and then befare building permits vvouid b� issued the applicant would need to record �lie <br />certificate of survey, the resolution oi approval and the easement documents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.