My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />;. �_ ��, �, ;. ,� ; ; � ��: z � � <br />Ii�Ie�fiin� I}ate: <br />��;�if �epor°� by: <br />�I�nni�ig Case l�fo. <br />iteq aeest: <br />Applic�nt: <br />�.ddress: <br />PIA1 #: <br />�oneng/I,7nd Use: <br />T.o� Saze: <br />Ap�lAeable �tegulatio�s: <br />0 <br />0 <br />January 6, I999 <br />James Ericson, Planning Associate <br />545-98 <br />Accessory Building Height Variance <br />Dan Gates <br />5364 Clifton Drive <br />0�-30-23-14-Q042 <br />R-1, �ingle Family Residential <br />10,449 Square �eet {.24 acres) <br />Section I 125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria io 6e used by the P(anning Commission in its <br />review of variances. <br />Section 1 I06.03, Subd. lc states that no accessory building shall exceed 15 feet in height. <br />Attachments: <br />Planning Appiication <br />Zoning Map <br />Resolution No. 568-99 <br />Background: <br />The applicant, Dan Gates, is requesting approvai of a variance to permit his under-construction <br />garage ta exceed the maximum height provision of 15 feet. The proposed height af the garage is <br />16 teet. The basis of the request is two-fold. The applicant would like the roof-line ofthe new <br />garage to nnatch the roof-line of the house, which has a fair[y steep s(ope. The other reason for <br />the variance request, and the basis for the hardship, is that the Ciiy is requiring iv1r. Gates' work <br />truck to be parked within his garage or to have it removed from the property altogether. (His <br />work tn.ick is a commercial vehicle as defined by City Code and as such is not allowed to be <br />parked outside in a residential district.) Because the truck is too tall to fit within a typically sizeci <br />jarage, Mr. Gates needs to install an eleven-foot garage cloor, thus raising the height of the <br />proposed garage by one foot. <br />On August I3, 1998, the applicant obtained a buiidin; permit to expand his garage, which <br />involved movin�q the existing garage baci: approximately fourteen feet and construciin� additional <br />garage space with a new door in tE�e front, to match the frant line and roof line of tl�e house. <br />:�fter having received an anonymaus complaint about commercial vehicles parked at the <br />applicant's house, sta�sent a fetter dated 9/4/98 which infarmed the applicant of the City Code <br />requirement prohibiting commercial vehicles fram bein� pa.rked outside in a residential district. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.