Laserfiche WebLink
City of Mounds View February t 7,1999 <br />Plaruling and Zoning Coinmission - Bylaws Page 6 <br />the Commissio;n shall find that their private or personai interests are invoived in any <br />matter coming bafore the Commission, they shall disqualify themselves fi-om talcing <br />part in any discussion or action on the matter; alternatively, they may be disqualified by <br />a two-thirds (2/3) nnajority vote of the Commissioners in attendance. <br />2. Conflict Due to Economic Interests: A Commissioner has a conflict of interest if, in his <br />or her discharge of official duties, would be reqaired to talce an action or mal:e a <br />decision that waald subsiantially affect the Commissioner's financial interesis or those <br />of an associated business, unless the effect on the Commissioner is no greater than on <br />other merr�bers of the Commissioner's business classification, profession, or <br />accupatiai�. In the event a conflict of interest exists with respect to a particular maifer <br />hefore the Commission, the Commissioner shall disqualifi;��i�er�rse�#�himseif or herself <br />from taking part in any discussion or action on the matter. <br />C. EX PARTE CONTACTS: Ex parte contacts are contacts between individuais seeking to <br />influenca the decisions ofthe Planning Commission and individuai Commission members <br />outside the meeting forurn. Such contacts include meetings with project proponents, <br />residents, property owners, and citizens separate from Commission meetings, <br />communication hetween Commission members outside the meeting forum, telephone <br />calls or letters which attempt to influence a Commissianer's opinion on a matter which <br />; wi(1 he subject to the Commissioner's vote. When the Planning Comtnission is involved <br />in a matter which is to be heard and decided by the Commission (e.g. variances), Planning <br />Cammissioners shail indicate to the person contacting them that such contact is <br />inappropriate and ail testimony needs to be offered at the hearing to e�nsure a fair hearing <br />for all parties. In a11 other cases, Planning Commissioners should discourage such contacts <br />and should avoid expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case. When ex parte <br />contacts occur, the Planning Commissioner is responsible for notifying the Community <br />Development Director, and for conveying the substance of the commue�ication at the next <br />connmission meeting at which the matter discussed is under consideration. <br />On March 3, 1999, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 570-99, a resolution adopting <br />its of�cial Bylaws (revised 2/17/99j as presented herein and a revised meeting sckedule. <br />AT"TEST: <br />3erry Peterson, Chairperson <br />Rick 3oplce, Comxnuuity Development Director <br />N:\DATAIGROUP5\COMDEV\PLANCOMMIBYLAWS�BXLAW 5.99 <br />