Laserfiche WebLink
N1oe��ds i�fl�� Plar�ning C'orn�i�saor� <br />It�gul�r Nl��ting <br />�+'e6ruar°y 17, 1999 <br />Page 4 <br />(Bec�zra�e Pe� Meyer, CabCe Cornmi�iee Chai��er�on, �was now preserat, the C�rrecrau�siosa ag�°eed <br />8o hear her pr�s�nPata�n �egardin� b�o�dcasP�ng of Pdannan� Cornrnission nieetir��s oaa cable <br />television). , <br />�. <br />�ta�f` lte�o�� /�t�ms of Infora�at�on <br />8a. <br />Peg Meyer infonmed the Cornmission ihat cablecastin� <br />16. She added that cameras will be run in March, but � <br />to allow the Commission to get a feel for being on carr <br />on what to do a� the meetings. She inforrr►ed.them the <br />asked ihat if any commissianer wauld have anything to <br />to please call Pat Toth, Cable Producer, ahead of time, <br />added that the Carr►mission may want to take a 1 r��k �zt <br />Co�aiinuation oi' Item 6: Cored°etio�at iJs ;_��e <br />a�� <br />Planning Associate Ericson contin,ue� . h ihe <br />should be some type of balance be '�" 'the si.; <br />added that it is probably not desi., to havt � <br />should be ihe nrimarv structure ci�i:� he nrnne�r�� <br />common i <br />C� 1p.�7i� <br />proposed �v�s �� ��rcent 1 <br />garage would �d�� 7Q �ersea <br />north is screened Uy a.rt��v <br />the west, ����t�� by 1�i�t <br />feet to � garag� may�r�t�� <br />park ��� oui the yard wt�t <br />, a ber <br />t, at 7 <br />A�y <br />siari o��pril 1 st on �'ab�� �h��el <br />�e�t��#"� �would not be c��l� ��fed Iive <br />' �i�� ��-.iefly instructed Lhe Comrrvssion <br />'ec���i�inc�t,, is rutuung smoothly. �he <br />;ent that �s�ii�d t�e oui of the ordinary, <br />ve hitr' ��h���,�� t�? prepare. She <br />web site t�tat �tai� has developed. <br />i CUP re�uest. Ke commented that there <br /><..._ <br />�� <br />the ga ;` e and the size of the house. He <br />ige d��%ing the house adding that the house <br />�lained that expanding a garage is a very <br />E'property. Mr. Ericson reviewed a similar <br />cwaod Drive. In that case the garage being <br />��r tk��� t�� house. He added that with the current proposal, the <br />larg�� tkt�n ihe, house. He aiso advised them that the property to the <br />�pine� i��s,'and is already separated by the garage. '�'he property to <br />��hes, atready looks out to the garage. The addition of another 15 <br />*��,;;��at much. The benefit would be that the vehicles currentiy <br />in the proposed garage. <br />TV�� �ric�on brought io� e Commission's attention one comment he received from the neighbor <br />�c�ss the street wit �gard to the proposal. This neighbor was concerned that ihere might be <br />t <br />s���� t�r�ac af bus��y being initiated in the garage. Mr. Ericson indicated that this issue could be <br />az�ir�s�� , -�`applicant. Mr. Ericson reminded the Commission that home occupations are <br />atiQr�r�c� �� �t� as certain criteria are met, mast importantly that it does not detrimentally impact <br />:;::,;<<;;: : >.. <br />the neig�%ors. Mr. Ericson informed the Commission that al] the criteria regarding ttzis CUP <br />request have been met and that Stafffelt that the 6enefit outweighs the impact of the proposal. <br />The main cor�cern is the significant size of the proposed garage. Mr. Ericsan noted that the <br />proposed resolution recomm�nds approval to the Ciiy Council, however, there are stipulations <br />attached ta ihe resoluiion. �/!r. �ricson addressed the concern regarding a business operating <br />from ihe garage and assured the Corr�missior� that the CUP could be revoked by th� City Council <br />in the event this occurred. <br />