Laserfiche WebLink
,. <br />l�ouxads �1iew Plann�n� Co�xreiss���► <br />I��gul�r I�/Ieeting <br />A�ral 7, 1999 <br />P��� 9 <br />The applicant, Dorothee Dietrich, is requesting approval to build a garage within the �stablished <br />frront setback of her property, which is located at 7805 Gloria C�rcie. This lot is one of the �ew <br />iots in the City which border Spring Lake, the City's only natural lake. The Zoning Code <br />prohihits the construction of a garage or any accessory building in the front yard o`� s�dential <br />rd a� is defined b the Code, is that area between���� fror��i ` e of the <br />property. The front ya , Y <br />principal structure (house} and the front property 1ine. <br />_ �. <br />Ericson advised it is proposed to turn the exlst�ng attacY� <br />However, if the Code requirements were foliowed to a`' <br />house and lake. He explained ihat because homes on ia� <br />lake, many communities offer a provision far allowing a <br />as it wouid be undesirable to construct the garage betwE <br />lots in the City where this becomes an issue, and 7805 C <br />He reviewed his anaiysis of other city's codes and <br />af a variance, noting a variance may only be gra�t; <br />undue hardship or practicai difficulties to the,�r� <br />a ca�e can be made for the existence o�' a h�.��ship <br />However, because it is not clear that all �'�he cril <br />may not be satisfied. Ericson nated �� ater fe.� <br />n���: � £ <br />Er�cson reviewed the Code <br />there are prov�ssions in plac <br />within the h��� area, th� � <br />� � � �, <br />and pres��:?th� xtnpactPC€< <br />situatior� o� c�.�n�ti t�� appl <br />practical diflScu�����x t�aer� <br />can requesi a v�,��� �s�' �' <br />���"�`e<'�c��� ci <br />ihe Code _ 2, <br />constru � n, discovery ��' <br />y, ; <br />beca changing comr�►uir <br />��x � .: nerties in the City,� <br />are ivi�� <br />eauest <br />it wou <br />ving sp <br />,en the home'�ri�i,��e`stree�, <br />and the lake. ih�re are six <br />;: o�le of those lots. <br />�e�,�.�n criteri� est�h��sl�ed for cansideration <br />�,���.pe� cases r�`her�,�he Code imposes <br />, <br />���� �'ric�on��i�dicated staffbelieves t at <br />. <br />� �����, �� ���,�pplicant's request. <br />can �'� �'�x��� the undue hardship requirement <br />is imp�rtan� �o this property. <br />� followe���y the G;��of Roseville and explained that while <br />5 ti <br />in�t bu�id��� ���aei���n and location of accessory but mgs <br />that this ���� s��t�1d remain in an undeveloped state to protect <br />�ture In sit�ations where the Code does not anticipate a given <br />sp�ci#'xc proper�y for reasons of undue hardship or through <br />�auz`��s;of action to remedy the situation: the property owner <br />�� �i��idment to the City Code. Ericson advised that amending <br />d ' 'nai <br />the e�ent that a mistake was made tn the Co e s ong� <br />�.t�on or condition wluch was not originally anticipated, or <br />indards over time warrant such a change. Because there are only <br />,h this condition would apply, amending the Code would not be <br />the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. <br />��������,��� ��°i��, 7805 Gloria Circle, applicant, advised that the impervious blacktop area of <br />about 50 fe�t by 25 feet will be removed and the garage built in that laca�ian, resulting in less <br />impervious surface than currently e�sts. <br />Cammiss�oner �tevenson asked if the actual garage placement will be considered. Ericson stiated <br />when the building permit is considered, if the variance is approved, staff will assure the garage <br />- placement meets the stat�d requ�rements including ti�e sethack distances of a 5ingle Fairiily <br />