Laserfiche WebLink
i, <br />:;:' :.�..: .- '�� l: .' C�.�- ::-�,., . � �.��.�:. ..;'.: <br />: . .... : ��..• �: . :.: <br />. i � . '.: . :�: . . . . - ' - ...:�:: . . �".�: ...�`> _. -�.:-: . <br />l��rands �se�' Plana�i�g Coa�e�tais�io� <br />�e�e��a� Meetan� <br />Apri17, 1999 <br />Pa�� 11 <br />Planning Commisszan agreed with this request to add: Prese�tation of Bridges Golf Course �ign <br />P1an. <br />Superiniendent Hammerschmidt explained the Ciiy Counci! had directed him to <br />possibility of billboards. He stated he does not like the view of billboards �rom <br />understands the merit of looking for alternaie income sources. He expl�%��t� �� <br />advertised "golf course coming" which. were removed with �� �,; tent o�`e�'������ <br />advertising the course and hours of operation. However, Q e was a bu�t�c#. �s <br />looking at the option af oflEering businesses naming rigt�t � ith the b��,�cs5 ��,� <br />Hammerschmidi stated they did erect an entry sign but p�t'��anent;��ry mar��� <br />.,, � . <br />1���� the <br />�c�� <br />ourses but <br />� past, signs <br />he <br />could cost up to $10,000. He advised he has been app�c���� ��'s��eone interest�c� �� �l���i�l� <br />billboards, which woutd be an income source, and after r�r3e�t���� �itt� ihetn it was deternuned thati <br />if signs were a possibi(ity, the golf eourse property wou►d �e ��� ���� ��tio�i and provide th� best <br />exposure for the vendor. Also, signs in that location c�'icl be lauri�c���a Yo improve the <br />, .. <br />appearance. � , __ . . _ , <br />Hanamerschmidt reviewed the nine praposed �"'� � <br />two additionai locations that could be use �_.� t are <br />on each of these tocatians and why they .< being � <br />questions. h• <br />,�:<: ; <br />Commissioner Braathen asked <br />viewable frorn fihe golf cour�: <br />ItFPs so v���a�s can be i�t�rk <br />it is di�i��tl�. �U ��u'er af"tl���'� <br />sites could h� rarik�d by that � <br />periadicaliy witli �t�c�x� �eina <br />_ ___..._.. <br />has <br />in Mou�?��`View. <br />�asily accessible. He noted <br />[ammerschmidt commented <br />offered to answer <br />� <br />s�tes wc� �i be th ' st vaivable and least hindrance or <br />lerscl�iidt Si���,�lie reasanable option would be to issue <br />He e��i�����d=�ncations in the wooded area may be best but <br />�e state� once more information is ohtained, the proposed <br />;I�ammerschmidi suggested that these sites be reviewed <br />� tt� �eep the signs. <br />discussion about not allowing any new billboard signs <br />Co ;y4;,`"�ssioner Kaden no �`"'� E�ie�placement of some focations near residential properties and asked <br />�f �h� si�ns would be pl���d directly adjacent to the freeway wall to prevent lights from shining <br />Ittt� tk�e residential ar . Hammerschmidt stated he agrees with this concern and advised that �he <br />�rx�c 's'�i�:ntifi�d o�:.;�kt�� ap are very rough. <br />, ��Y <br />�;�� ����� ��i=esenting Eiler Media, stated the signs ha,ve to be of�'the freeway right�of way and <br />ihey a,re r�commendir►g the size oi 14 high by 4� long �vith all metal construction. <br />Hammersclunidt stated he has received same calls of concem. He advised that the City can <br />control cont�nt of the signs. <br />Commissioner Braathen stat�d he approached the Mayor abouf the poss�bility of allowing signage <br />