Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />1VI��nds Vrewd Pla�n��rg Co��isseo� <br />Re��lar° I�I�etae�g <br />Ap�°il 7, 1999 <br />Page 13 <br />stated they are usually at least i4 feet o�the geound wiuch ailows a ten-foot tadder to be in place <br />without ready access from the ground. He stated anoth�r option is to piace the sign directly on <br />the ground with a Iatiice bottom. h�'. Cronin stated they understand they are guests ar�d are <br />concerned with addressing all issues. � � <br />Chair Peterson stated if signs are approved, he would be very <br />removed. Hammerschmidt stated he shares that concern b� <br />reached, if approved. �,, <br />Hammerschmidt stated the next step wilt be to apply <br />Then it can be debated by the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner Laube stated that he would like to see th� <br />proposed when the application is submitted. � <br />Mr. Dean explained the signs are very site <br />work in ail locations. Mr. Cronin stated if <br />provide more design details when the sites <br />� <br />Haenmerschmidt suggested he prepa����iigg <br />- - presented io provide a more clear����> the <br />several vendors making a presen,#���n of wh <br />s::: <br />locations <br />Commiss►oner ����r��; <br />site would : `�ip tlle' �c <br />and sta • e plac�m� <br />nictu � e created of <br />er Miller <br />a sunset� <br />it ta <br />�ed <br />:dtobe <br />can be <br />subrnit <br />style and size being <br />� sign ihat would <br />they wiil be able to <br />�u� with �l�otos oi the site thai could be <br />Aiso a��posal could be submitted with <br />���it� has been addressing how to prevent <br />they are being asked ta consider multiple <br />if ar��r t�� the sites are approved, having pictures or video of the <br />to ad�iress impacts to surrounding areas. Hammerschznidt agreed <br />:t��l an the map are very preliminary in nature. He suggested �hat <br />�enerated signs on these sites. <br />her support for Hammerschmidt's suggestion to rank ihe sites and <br />on for the billhoards. � <br />6 33 > <br />������������ ���enson asked if the Piannin� Commission is being asked to make a genera <br />cotic�i=irc�s ���rsinent. Ericson stated there are several elements r�iated ta capaci�y. He advised <br />th��-� is a curr�nt Code requirement to allow no more signs aiong tlxe freeway unless advertising <br />the use on the property. Therefore, a variance or a Code amendment would need to be <br />considered to make it allowable. Ericson siated in the CRP Dlstrict, it is possible far someone to <br />propose a deveiop��nt plan. He suggested the Code limitation be addressed as weii as the <br />signage issue within the Ck� Districi and approva� of a development plan. <br />� , <br />