Laserfiche WebLink
4 ...::. " }',".� <br />l' <br />IVioeends Vacv� Planni�c� Corre�issYOra <br />Specia� 1`�eetin� <br />I)e�ember 16, i99� <br />Page 6 <br />Motion/Secondu �rasaemEe/Miiler to recommend to the City Counci] approval o£Resoluiion Iiio. <br />565098, A Resolution Recommending Approval of an Alternate Site Ptan (Developmeni Review) <br />for the Proposed Building IV I?evelopment, �io�nds View �usiness Park, as amen in the <br />previous motian. �, <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 <br />LT�ch made the comment thai the City shoeald cansider <br />the business park in an effart to eliminate future parkin� <br />s�a� report written in regard #o this evening's meeting r� <br />report would refleci Ulrich's comments. <br />Spece�l Planning �as� l�io. SI'-Ob6-9� [P��9� <br />Properties Invo�ved: Comer Lats, Single-Famil� � <br />� z <br />Consideration of an Amendment to Chapter '� �01 <br />Parking Requirements) Regarding Multip! urb �u <br />Resideniial Districts. � <br />No public was pr�sent <br />Peierson . � the pu <br />;�c�;� � <br />RigDs aveR���e �s...., < <br />� n€�...�: ��:�• <br />City Att <br />work or <br />City Cp;� <br />doesn't <br />l as a gvidelin�. <br />per�:ent, which <br />y is now in vio� <br />ormity is if'� i <br />�. If vou'r�'�"'i�nl <br />� <br />�Ii <br />blem�. <br />the <br />>i:`ity Code (Off-�treet <br />within Single-F'amily <br />�'.a`�� '� d come down to whether Mr, i'obias had done repa.ir <br />i t of his driveway. The bottom Iine is that Mounds View's <br />Like many city cades, they don'� cover evecything. They are <br />���'�'obias' case, a noncon%rming situation was destroyed by more <br />ul�not have been rebuilt," Riggs stated. He added, Mr. Tobias' <br />n of the Code and would eequire a variance. "The idea o#' <br />noi confocm once it reaches the end af its useful life, �hat end period, <br />ig a driveway because you can't overlay it, thafi sug;ests it is to th� <br />:d itself otat, and that's th� idea of a nonconf'orming sYatute, ar <br />ihe City has," Riggs said. <br />Petersan said the Iast time th� Comrrvssion was faced with this issue the same conclusian was <br />drawri. The applicani was in violation of the Code. Obert said i'obias` driver�ay was a <br />nonconfomiing use to l�egin with, NoY oniy was the old asphalt removed and th� bas� <br />undemeath, but the tree roats undemeath the base was removed, Obett said. He said the <br />