Laserfiche WebLink
�; <br />j <br />, , ;:- <br />I�I�uaacis �ger�r Planreing Co�►�►xiss�on <br />Re��ia�° I�eetin� <br />Apa°i121, 1999 <br />Pa�� l� <br />to be more conducive of redevelopment and reuiilization oi prope�cies. He noted that if the Code <br />is amended, there would be no hardsYiip because iti would be allowed and not need a variance. <br />Chair 1'eterson stated �f a Code amendment is considered, it would have to be <br />assure setback distances are maintained. In this case, he stated he sees. n.A: �Qth <br />believes it would be unreasonable to refuse to allow the propc�ty own��` tc� ��s; <br />�OTIQN/5ECOND: Hegla.tad/I�aden �o adopt Planning �ssion lZ��ii <br />resoluiion approving � variance to allow the required fiv,,,, � at side "'set <br />struciure living space iocated at 5302 Ita,ymond Ave�ue, ��iound�, '� w Pla <br />� fF * <br />t . :' <br />99. __ __ _ �. <br />:;: ; <br />Commissioner 1Vlill�r requesied a correction to the fot <br />to elimina�e ar►e of the words "not" from the firsi line, <br />criteria have all been met so she wili vote against. ;,;,;,:; <br />Chair Peterson requested that additional <br />the uniqu� situation, Ericson suggested <br />alternatives to expansion ar� very timite� <br />Ericson suggested wording as <br />b u i l d i n g units; and given ihe c <br />restrictive." ,;. ,.<'� <br />] <br />written to <br />tives and <br />9, a <br />Page 2 of the resolution <br />he does mot believe the <br />ne resolutioi� to clarify <br />to indicate that <br />ry n th e lot is ,> y l 00 feet wide and supports two <br />of the �.,;- ing de��= which makes building expansion overiy <br />-zendly ann�i�iment <br />=;,:. <br />� >t Nays - 1 <br />�.. , ,,�' <br />#'ot°�eataon <br />r�,ct�ons <br />to the motion. <br />The motion carried. <br />m� Director Jopke updated the Planning Commissian regarding recent <br />sions an a proposed TI�' office/warehouse development and,continuing <br />��hat project. He staied thai depending on the next EDA discussion, that <br />may not move forward. , <br />Joplc���� �vi�wed the survey which was recently cond�acted regaxding the dispositic�n of a remnant <br />parcel that will be created when Edgewood is realigned. He not�d the responses received wzth <br />the clear �najority suppo�rttimg the City to keep ii and da no�hi�g with it or use ii for a storm water <br />pond. Jopke advised that the Council was concerned with the low number of responses and asked <br />staff ta get more citizen input fcam an aver-ali community survey. <br />