Laserfiche WebLink
� > i <br />IVYQUnds j7iew Planrean� C'or�e�issean <br />Regular° I1�Ieeiin� <br />Ayes � 6 Nays - 0 <br />50 �tafi Iie�sor�s / Itean� of In%a�rrsaiaon <br />A. ��liboards <br />Caznmunity Develapmeni I7irector Jopke explained the ��ncil h� <br />Commission to continue ta iook into and make recomm�t�c�{itions::, <br />atiowed and what process should be used if it is detern,�F�ec� ��.�� �}` <br />at the goif course. He stated that he was not a"fan" of bill(��i�td�' <br />aboui granting variance� to allaw biilboards on the golf �i�i'�� arzc <br />He stated he believes this would constitute a use varian� whiclt zs <br />He suggestied, as an alternate method af addressin� i�is �f the �ity <br />�hat they consider a Code amendment. � ` <br />ropke stated if the City wishes to proceed� <br />be amended to allow biilhoards by cond� c <br />be speeified ir� the Code. He review < e <br />. `;•� <br />sign area, maximum sign height, m <br />configuration, rrunimum distance .,:,"' /or sc <br />� ,� <br />number of bi�lboards aliowe�� p��itted io <br />setback r�qt���'��n�nis) ' ; <br />Jopke stated ,� ��c;t�r��:,i� <br />have to also obt�in a p�, <br />commerc�al oz,az��G�st'ria: <br />����., <br />MnD�T �� apprctv� <br />golf co =�> e to PF since ; <br />sign � e technically do <br />Co��coutd be amended <br />. :� ;=rs . . , <br />u <br />I�'Iay 5, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />The motion carried. <br />s �;�i�ed th� ,l.xt��tt��� <br />�.��whether b`i�l�c�ari�� ��ac��i �d be <br />e �ity wants to a1�c�� �illboards <br />:u�d has serious misgivings <br />oil�er sites in Mounds View. <br />�arr��.b�ted by State Statutes. <br />���h�; �t�;�ermit billboards, <br />i11k���ri t�s, ���i�ould recammend the Code <br />,. <br />ut an€� tha� specific standards for 6illboards <br />�dards that could be included (ma�mum <br />�ve� \ biilboards, pole type, sign face <br />�t�c ents from residential properiy, totai <br />um length of permit, a�d mir�imum <br />t�t���� laave to be overcome is that the billboard company will <br />��t����; which requires that billboards must be located in <br />�ist���� `The golf course is zoned CRP and it is unclear whether <br />in th�i zoning district, An alternative would be to rezone the <br />scs are pernvtted uses in the PF district. However, the current <br />rinit any signage in the CRP or PF zone. Under this scenario, the <br />billboards in PF and/or CRP districts if a conditional use permit <br />�c���� ��.���sted,,�����'lanning Commission discuss the general concept outlined �.s well as what <br />Ici.�ad t�� �au�tt� ����itt process should be utiiized. Based on direction from the Planning <br />�c�'�nr����cr�a; �taff could then prepare draft ordinance amendments for their consideration at a, <br />future meeiin�. <br />Commissioner Johnsan asked if t4us will "apen the door" far Highway 10 biilboard requests. <br />Jopke s�aggested the Cod� specify specifi� areas and wh�re billboards wauld and dvould not b� <br />perrr�itt�d vvith a CUP process. Highway 10 would not need to be Iisted as a pernutted area. <br />�. <br />') <br />� <br />