My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TJP A.ri'�N� �' � �I�N Il�AN�E <br />��r�r�o�ucTio� <br />The sign ardina.nce is one of the most complex, diffcult, and emotional issues a community can <br />undertake to overhaul. It is complex because there are so many different types of signage and so <br />many different functions signs perform. Difficult because there are so many different issues to <br />address and so many peopie to please. And emotional because the right of a business, <br />organization, or an individual to express him-, her-, or iiself, and fo communicate their existence <br />atid message to the larger community is seen as a sacred right, and tampering with it an unholy <br />interference. Or, canversely, the right of residents to have their horizon free of any visual clutter <br />is also a sacred right. Our fust advice: tread carefully and thoughtfuily on the path to sign <br />ordinance refonn. <br />� :. � �. �, �; '- - ��; ,� �. . � , ���� <br />As with any zorung issue, if there is no problem, don't fix it. But if there are constant complaints <br />from business owners thai they can't get enough signage, fhat their competitors have an unfair <br />advantage, or that church staff can't advertise their Spring bzealtfast or their Sunday school <br />classes without a ream of government paperwork, or if community members are beating down <br />the doors of City/Town I�Eall compiaining about the visuai blight from signs on Main Street or the <br />neon glare on the Yughway, then you should cansider reviewing the sign ordinance xegulatians. <br />The sign ordinance is largely an aesthetic issue, so as a community considers other ordinances <br />tied to community aesthetic standards, such as lar�dscaping and building materials, a review of <br />signage issues may not be far behind. What was acceptabie in 1.950 or 1970 may not be at all <br />appropriate today cozzsidering the size, shape, and character of the community• Times change <br />and so do zoning standards. <br />� ;� ...,.�. <br />.,�. �; . � � • ��y :. <br />1. Pacic a l�nch< <br />Experience in a number of communities suggests thai there is no quick way to address the <br />sign ordinance well. It is a matter for several months of intense work, if not a year or <br />more. To address all the issues, hear all the concerns and craft an ordinance that is clear, <br />consistent and fair, takes times. <br />2, Identi at�d involve the stak� laoider°s. <br />Know who is involved and how. A comznunity xnight take a survey of business owners <br />and r�sidents to f�el out signage issues. You mighi corasult 4he locat Chamber of <br />Commerce, neighborhood organizations, service clubs, church groups, eic. If a city <br />4 <br />� __. ; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.