My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Resolution 579-99 <br />Leon Var►ance <br />June 2, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />4. Granting a variance to allow a three-season porch or other type of Iiving space addiiion <br />would not be a special privilege--mast praperties in this district either have simiiar types of <br />additions or have the space to construct such additions. <br />5. The variance requested is the minitnum variance which woutd alleviate the hardship in that <br />the property owners wish to replace an existing deck with the enclosed living space <br />addition. If the addition were to be constructed observing the proper setbacks, it would <br />only be seven feet deep--not enough raom for a table and chairs. The five foot variance is <br />the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship, <br />6. The purpose of the variance provision ir� the Code is to give reiief to property owners <br />seeking to improve their properties yet are unable to do so because of zoning code <br />requirements and factors beyond their control. Granting this variance for a living space <br />addition would not be materially deirimentai to the pur�ose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br />7. A living space addi�ion of such a limited size {12� sqnare feet) at the reduced side yard <br />setback would not impair a suppty of light or increase congestion, nor would it increase <br />the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. _:' :;, <br />Adopied this 26th day of April, 1999. <br />Jerry Peterson, Chairperson <br />ATTEST: <br />Rick Jopke, Community Development Director <br />(SEAL} <br />N:IDATA\GItpUPS\COMDEV�DEVCASEStiS 53-991574-99PC.RES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.