Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />i <br />...: � ..:. . .. -.. :-. <br />�.. . � ,- � -:� � ��."� ����: �.-� - <br />I�'Io�nds V�e� Planr�an� Cornrraiss�on <br />Ite�ul��- I�/Ie�t�n� <br />�Iay 19, 1999 <br />Page 8 _ ' <br />Community Development Director Jopka gave an update regaratng the issue of ' <br />community. He stated that he believed that a Code amendment was the rr�ost a ro ri <br />b�Ilboards in the <br />approach the issue. He stated that h e h a d b e e n d i r e c t e d by t�e planning Commis '� <br />f u r t h ee research into the State requiremenis for a permit and had je P� p a t e w a y t o <br />grant a permit in commercia1 or industrial zoning districts an � to conduct <br />arned th;�t tI����ate would only <br />a sitvation where re-zoning was dane strictiy for the pu ��at thPt� �3xn„�.� ,�_� • <br />the Stat� also requires pernvts for' billboards along State a <br />spoken to a consultant who int'ormed }�im that a pe�� ha <br />to allow for a billboard on a galf course within an insti <br />gndicated a precedent had been set. <br />Jopke stated he spoke to Mike Cronin who suggested <br />b��g whether or not CRp is the proper zoning far the <br />regarding signage in a CRI� or PF dtstricts need to �� �� <br />no signage is pern�it�ed Fn these districts but the ` <br />of the overall discussion. Jo pke s t a t e d t h a �� i� �� �� <br />discussed with Mike Hammerschmidt <br />approximately $12-24,000 per year ex, ,���° bel�eu� <br />� <br />such as �he location of the billboard, p,` ���board���pE <br />Chair Peterson stated that he <br />�ssue a permit in <br />�,. _�_ . , - <br />�ssues to considered, on� <br />��11y, that the Code issues <br />f fh�t at the present time, <br />'«jd be addressed as part <br />rvenue projections were <br />provider as weil as <br />and asked if they genera.ted revenue. <br />�z any revenue generated from the s�gns �,aujd <br />and could not be directed to the Genera! Fund. <br />�Y�� spoken with the Cammunity Development Directors of the <br />�hb �nforn�ed him thai their requirements prohibited construction <br />this point, he had not been able to determine when the Ordinance <br />ald find no discussion which addressed the billboard issue in the <br />'��.� stated that the issues should be defined and resolved before furthe� <br />�� <br />�ted that th� Comrriission not "shut the door" on the billboard issue. <br />very few vacant bi116oards, and if they are vacant, it was because the We ate�d <br />stated that Mr H <br />e <br />ammerschm�dt was researching tocations that wouideb <br />�PP�opI°�ate for bi11boards. He requested that the Work Sessions be reschedu]ed ta <br />Wednesday so that he wauld have the o ortunit to attenci, He su <br />be to chan�e that current CR.P zoning.pp y m��t on <br />ggested the first direciion would <br />l <br />r. `'� <br />